Crash.Net User: JedPB67

Comments rating: 3596
Position in rating: 30

Show Comments on:


May 26, 2015 6:39 AM

F1 » Lauda upset with ‘unacceptable’ Mercedes mistake

I cannot believe how well Hamilton composed himself post race, for sure he wasn't beaming, but who would be. It doesn't matter if it's a club race or the Monaco GP, the most prestigeous sprint race in the world, no one likes to lose a race win like that. I know I'll get called a fanboy, just like anyone does that isn't calling Hamilton a c**t does, but put yourself in that situation. Would you have been so easy going post race? I know I wouldn't have been.


May 26, 2015 6:44 AM

MotoGP » Smith, Espargaro team up for Yamaha at Suzuka 8 Hours

Noriben: It would be a great opportunity for Smith to learn and exercise how to pass riders in front of him, which is the ability he's lacking the most as we have witnessed at Le Mans.
Finishes 1.2 behind the 2 time MotoGP world champion on a weekend where Smith did bloody well. Still not enough for some people. I swear Smith could be P1 in every single session, race included, at Mugello and people would still complain and moan about his performance.


May 26, 2015 6:51 AM

MotoGP » Smith, Espargaro team up for Yamaha at Suzuka 8 Hours

PR: As for Pol and Brad, I have nothing against them, but would trade them for Vale and Jorge any day of the week. Wasted opportunity...
How is it a wasted oppurtunity? Espargaro said in an interview (posted on Crash on May 15th) "First the official guys have to choose and if they don't want to go maybe I will go." It's not like Rossi and Lorenzo weren't asked.


May 21, 2015 6:49 AM

MotoGP » Kent: We had the pace to pull away

Navelgazer: Still not sure why the team made the decision not to go back out towards the end of Quali tho? I know it was wet and then drying but DK52 was 31st with a time nearly 8 secs off the front guys. Surely he could have got a little closer to the front than that if he's gone out and done a few laps on a wet tyre? Even a couple of rows forward would have given him more tyre left for the race.
No chance that would have happened. 5 riders went back out at the end of the session - Gardner, Kornfeil, Locatelli, Oettl and Suzuki. Between them they completed 17 flying laps, the quickest of which was a 2:01.581 by Kornfeil, that time was still 8.762 seconds slower than Kent's qualifying time.


May 20, 2015 7:24 AM

WSBK » Sepang teases mystery ‘legendary’ wild-card

Jordi: cannot expect a 40-something rider who has been retired for several years to come back and fight for a top-5 position in a WSBK race overnight. Bayliss couldn't do it, and unlike Biaggi, he had kept himself very active racing locally in Australia.
In fairness to Biaggi he's been very active, he's ridden the WSB spec Aprilia more than enough to still be capable of a top 10 as well as 2 or 3 tests on the Ducati MotoGP bike at Mugello, he's only been out of racing for 2 and a half years, the Pirelli's won't have moved on that much, neither would the Aprilia. Bayliss had been away from WSB for 6 years, he would have faced much more change than Biaggi would if he were to come back for this Sepang race...which he's not, because it's Haga.


May 20, 2015 7:12 AM

F1 » HAVE YOUR SAY: F1’s proposed rule changes

GPdB: Allow close contact rough racing below 240kph by bodywork preventing direct tire to tire contact Require tough flexible outer body pieces to allow contact without damage They should be tested by the FIA with a hammer for toughness Protect the driver with a canopy!
So you want cars that can do 150mph, that are no longer open wheel so that they can hit each other accompanied by bodywork that'll allow for such contact to be made without major damage being caused? Have you heard of touring cars? :)

Page 5 of 136
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.