Crash.Net User: RawDawg

Comments rating: 11874
Position in rating: 2

Show Comments on:

RawDawg

May 24, 2014 5:58 PM

F1 » Hamilton angry over Rosberg error


SAS2R: I see a high probability of these two getting tangled up in the race. If Lewis cannot beat him in the first couple of corners then I see him waiting and trying to overtake on the pit stop cycle. If that fails, you know he's going to push hard and try to overtake, in which case it could end in tears for both drivers.
And you think that why? Because Lewis has done it before to Nico? Er, no. He's been clearly faster than Nico all year and also has raced him cleanly.

RawDawg

May 24, 2014 5:55 PM

F1 » Hamilton angry over Rosberg error


here4thesun2:
Jim Clausen: If Lewis carries his anger into the race he won't finish, much less win.
I am thinking that if Rosberg gets the jump off the line, we could see a new manufacturer win. I don't think Hamilton has the maturity or the integrity to race cleanly since he thinks he has been wronged. The spat between him and Massa was over who could 5th to 8th place the best. The stakes are a bit higher here.
And that's based on what? Lewis has dusted Nico this year and has passed him cleanly in previous races.

RawDawg

May 10, 2012 3:15 PM
Last Edited 903 days ago

MotoGP » Vermeulen replaces Edwards for Le Mans MotoGP


@sameoldsameold So now stating CORRECT results is "trying to wind other posters up"? You have nothing to say to ForumExpertsAreAJoke who incorrectly states that Chris' MotoGP stats are close to Hayden yet Hayden has 4 times more podiums. You have nothing to say to Realist who trys to slam Chris' stats yet they are far more impressive than Haslams. Yet I'm the one you wanna call out - for what? Actually knowing what I'm talking about and stating the correct results? EDIT by CRASH.NET! This is a forum for debate. Attacks on other posters will be removed.

RawDawg

May 09, 2012 10:31 PM
Last Edited 903 days ago

MotoGP » Vermeulen replaces Edwards for Le Mans MotoGP


"CV's motogp success stats aren't that far behind Hayden, and Chris never had a Repsol Honda under his date.." @ForumExpertsAreAJoke Stats aren't that far behind? What the hell are you looking at?? Chris has 7 podiums - Nicky has 28. That's 4 times more podiums! Not to mention the actually title, more wins, more poles, more fastest laps, etc. That's beyond not far behind - that's a whole nother career. EDIT by CRASH.NET! You have been asked to tone down your comments. Do not be so agressive to other posters.

RawDawg

May 10, 2012 3:13 AM

MotoGP » Vermeulen replaces Edwards for Le Mans MotoGP


er, Realist So I take you don't know Vermeulen won WSS which is a world championship. I don't care for either but since you took it there, Chris career stats are more impressive than Haslams. Chris first 2 years in WSBK (10 wins and 23 podiums) is more impressive than Haslams WSBK career of 119 races (3 wins and 26 podiums). Not that's it's already a wrap but add in Chris' MotoGP podiums, poles, and win and it's pretty clear who stats are more impressive.

RawDawg

May 09, 2012 5:45 PM

MotoGP » Vermeulen replaces Edwards for Le Mans MotoGP


Nothing says "look at me, I'm on the radar, give me a good MotoGP ride" like riding at the back of the grid right?? lol. Please. Once again, Haslam would have been foolish to race this bike in it's current state. Riders put themselves on the radar by having GOOD results in wildcard rides - not back of the pack with no hope of even a top 10. Haslam would be better serve by putting himself "on the radar" by winning WSBK races and fighting for the title - not being a backmarker on hopeless kit as a wildcard.

RawDawg

May 09, 2012 2:11 PM
Last Edited 904 days ago

MotoGP » Vermeulen replaces Edwards for Le Mans MotoGP


EDIT by CRASH.NET! Inapropriate comment removed. Please tone down your comments and lay off the attacks. The only riders that would take this ride is someone like Chris who is out of work, needs to show himself on something, and isn't risking missing up a full time gig. If any of you think someone like Haslam who is running at the front in WSBK and probably making good coin doing it would race this bike in it's current state than you're a idiot.

RawDawg

May 09, 2012 1:04 AM
Last Edited 905 days ago

IndyCar » Alesi secures unlikely Indy 500 seat


I would have hoped Jean would have come to his senses and called this Indy thing off by now. This has disaster written all over it. It was bad enough he was trying to run with an experienced team but to do it was an Indy Lights team with a Lotus engine? He doesn't have a chance in hell of winning so why he going out there risking life and limb? Indy is the last place to be messing about because you can get injured REALLY bad REALLY quickly. He's old, has zero oval experience, running with an inexperienced team, crap engine in the car, and this isn't like the old days when the track was open for practice the whole month of May. I don't see any good coming of this. I'm with Coop - he'll be lucky and doing himself a favor if he fails to qualify.

RawDawg

May 08, 2012 2:45 PM

MotoGP » Ducati: Full upgrade package for Laguna Seca


Well I guess no contracts will be sign until after Laguna, huh? Why are you guys saying Ducati didn't listen to Val and Burgess? Have you guys forgotten last year and half? Did Ducati not go in after the Valencia test of 2010 and knock up a "soft" package for Val based on his feedback and request? Did Ducati not stuff a 800cc engine in their orginial GP12 1000cc bike because Val said if was a better kit and had more rear grip? Did they not go to an aluminum frame at his request? Are we just gonna dismiss that because he had a little hissy fit? Does he expect Ducati to design a new chassis and engine every time he request it?


Page 1 of 641
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.