Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

30 agree. 6 disagree.
Report Abuse
I strongly disagree with the sentences "He was extremely unlucky" and "he gave him some room". He drove straight into Kobayashi, who simply held his line. How is that unlucky?
Posted by sodesu (265 days ago)
Recommended Comment
Show Comments on:

Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
Better to have them moan than crash though I suppose.
Posted by sodesu (2 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
Well yes, the "Moto3" and also the "debut home win" kind of gives away which Rossi it is they're talking about. Duh.
Posted by sodesu (3 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
6 agree. 4 disagree.
Report Abuse
Shrieker, yes Hamilton is brilliant when it comes to single fast laps, I don't think anyone will argue with you on that. Jenson will rarely match him on single lap pace, that's plain for anyone to see. What Hamilton is not so good at though, is exactly what Jenson is brilliant at: a little thing called race craft. Both are important of course, but it is a fact you cannot get away from that a single fast quali lap will not win you a race. And sadly, almost as legendary as Lewis' qualifying pace is, is his unique ability to throw away points positions.
Posted by sodesu (3 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
Why should they shut down because they are not fastest? I would guess they are working toward becoming faster, catching up, climbing up the order. That's what you do when you're last. If everyone who finished last would quit there wouldn't be anyone left in 12 years you know.
Posted by sodesu (4 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
9 agree. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
I'm confused. Didn't he say he would never ever change his approach?
Posted by sodesu (4 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Well yes, forcing everyone to do a compulsory lap at cruise speed will really spice the show up.
Posted by sodesu (5 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Err what? This will give the teams an incentive to get out there and go for it. Just forcing them to set a time, as someone suggested, would give the teams an incentive to cruise around for a full lap, saving tyres as they go and forming dangerous moving chicanes as a bonus. You just have to ask the question WHY they choose to not run. The answer is that they feel they have more to gain from saving a set of fresh tyres than to go out and ruin them and gain maybe one or two grid places. Forcing them to go for it will never work, they might as well try and go as slow as possible (remember the "fuel burning laps", anyone?) then. The only way to make them go for is to make sure they have nothing to lose and all to gain from it. For that reason I think dedicated Q tyres are a pretty good solution.
Posted by sodesu (5 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
All things considered I think de Puniet is a more likely pick than anyone on that list...
Posted by sodesu (5 days ago)
Last Edited 5 days ago
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees.
Report Abuse
He mights just have that though. I think it's a fair guess that when CEPSA's deal with the Toros end they will continue backing Alguersuari.
Posted by sodesu (6 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
3 agree.
Report Abuse
I'm sure Fernandes have already been in negotiations with them. All he ever wanted was a name tag, and Lola would probably have been a better one than Caterham. But now he's got one so it's probably best to stick with it.
Posted by sodesu (6 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 1 of 53
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »
Have Your Say Comments

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.