Crash.Net User: rob01

Comments rating: 6132
Position in rating: 9

Show Comments on:


June 19, 2014 6:55 PM

F1 » Stewards to reconsider Perez/Massa clash

richard: this is most odd. whilst i have always said it was a racing incident, i dont think that fi lodged an appeal within the time frame. it looks as if they have just asked stewards to relook (funny, they are different stewards!) at the issue. i dont think that the penalty can be negated, but there again, the fia are a law unto themselves. this could set a precedent where different stewards are asked to comment on the previous stewards ruling.
hey richard. see what i told you?


June 18, 2014 10:21 PM

F1 » Mallya: We want to continue ruffling feathers...

richard: rob. americas cup? wasnt that the series which the americans were losing big time, and had to be saved by drafting in a brit?
hmm hmm... i would have thought you of all people would have enjoyed the creativity. i know it peaked neweys interest as i hear there has been a falling out at Red Bunk. might explain why he went to see webber race instead of the grand prix earlier this year.


June 18, 2014 8:23 PM
Last Edited 71 days ago

F1 » Mallya: We want to continue ruffling feathers...

Mark richard: rob. we already sold you a bridge. remember? it was the london bridge, and you thought that it was the iconic tower bridge, and only got a nondescript stone bridge instead. so if anyone knows how to sell a bridge, it is the brits! Are you still spinning that old yarn? This story has been debunked for years. Is rob01 really Robert McCulloch, the purchaser of the bridge? i was selling the one in San Fran. The one where the Americas Cup was. won

Page 22 of 834
« 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.