Crash.Net User: rob01

Comments rating: 7272
Position in rating: 14

Show Comments on:


December 26, 2015 1:17 PM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year 2015 - Full results

JohnMarston: Oh look Richards favorite driver polled last. Wonder how he feels about it
well, i wasnt going to respond to this inane comment but had second thoughts...........i dont have a favourite driver, but unlike you, i do reckon that maldo is not the worst by any means. he is a magnet , its true, but many of his accidents are not actually caused by him. AND, he has more gp wins than many others on the grid. that cannot be too bad, can it? now , you can go back to your sherry.
bwaA HA... you don't have a favorite driver. NOT one person on here believes that one.


December 23, 2015 9:33 PM

F1 » Mercedes, Ferrari are controlling F1 – Newey

valsp: No complaint from him when red bull controlled the racing for years using designs that would have been outlawed if Ferrari had introduced them
so i guess that you missed the fact that when rbr introduced something innovative on their cars, exploiting loopholes, that merc and ferrari immediately filed for clarification and hey presto, the rules were changed to prevent these innovations. so how on earth can you claim that rbr "controlled" the racing?
At times they stepped out so far they had to be slapped back in.


December 27, 2015 2:39 PM

F1 » Mercedes taking Ferrari threat ‘very seriously’

ProfessorX: actually it's beyond any reasonable doubt that Kimi will take points of Vettel next year. Well, Torger did have a 'sizeable' stake in WIlliams, but not any more, any wonder why Susie isn't there any more? Why their cars are going slower this year?
kimi take points off seb? well, he would have to beat him to do that, and there is little chance of that. far more chance of nico taking points off lulu! as for wolff dropping his shares in williams....since when?
Dan the man took a bunch of points off the finger. It can be done.

Page 6 of 969
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.