Crash.Net User: Drymaster1

Comments rating: 137
Position in rating: 1061

Show Comments on:


March 18, 2012 4:51 PM

F1 » Vettel: Second most we could have achieved

That was a drive of a double-world champion. Aggression, maturity, awareness, resilience, all on display. I personally liked how after going wide, Seb had the presence of mind to know Rosberg was close enough to get a chance, and accelerated on the grass to lose as little time as possible, and then had the confidence to break later than Nico, off-line, with dirty tires and slightly behind to believe he would make the corner.


March 17, 2012 8:40 AM

F1 » Hamilton takes Australian GP pole

"Drymaster they are a lot closer than last year" Wait what? You mean Mclaren are closer to RB this year? But RB is better atm? I havent been here lately, can anyone say if ronsgoldenboy is a troll? If so, I apologize for entering into a discussion with him and wasting all of your time. Oilspud, so youre saying Button isnt that good? Then what are you all getting excited about if Ham got pole, certainly he shouldve gotten it by a bigger margin against such a poor driver or something.


March 17, 2012 8:32 AM

F1 » Hamilton takes Australian GP pole

Well Im a Seb/Kimi fanboy, but I would never say RB wasnt the best car of 2011. Better in quali than in races too, should be pretty obvious for everyone. ron, let me get this straight. Rb7 got 1-3 in this quali with Webber losing 8 tenths to Seb, therefore RB7 was an alltime great car. Now Mcs get a clear 1-2 and the playing field is equal. Funny how that works. Its pretty obvious from which angle your coming from and Im not in the mood of discussing this matter anymore coz it will be pointless.

Page 1 of 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.