Recommended Comment

RECOMMENDED COMMENT

8 agree. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
''229 because if another team bar Ferrari did that you would be the first to complain look from other teams perspective''

How would i be? learn the rules buddy. he drove the 2007 Ferrari with GP2 tyres. infact teams such as Red Bull, Renault and BMW run old cars with old tyres all the time in their displays they have in different cities, infact they're 2009 drivers do these demos. last week BMW ran a 2008 car at Nurgburgring and i didnt complain once. Ferrari have broken no rules here.

they have also asked the FIA and FOTA for permission to run the 2009 spec car, which hasnt been agreed yet, on the FIA's side atleast. Learn the facts pal
Posted by 229 (118 days ago)
Last Edited 118 days ago
Recommended Comment
Show Comments on:

Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
JET Before this year most people would have thought Jenson wasnt championship material either. who knows what Nick could do in a brawn or Ferrari? Last year though Kubica did beat him so they are 1 all at the moment. Lets see what happens for the rest of the year. Personally i think that if USF1 or any of the other new teams want a experinced driver in one of their cars, Nick is the best option. Also dont forget, he did beat Kimi in the same car......
Posted by 229 (84 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
Guys the only car that matters is the one Fernando is driving, thats what we are here to discuss, so lets talk about that
Posted by 229 (84 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
3 agree.
Report Abuse
JohnsonsEvilTwin - Prost wasnt the best wet weather driver and he won 4 titles......... personally i think Nick is underrated but i still rate Kubica just above him, more so on sheer pace his age and how well he drove last year .one thing ill give Nick he is a uneventful driver, chaos can happen and who ends up on the podium? Hiedfeld. thats isnt by fluke in difficult races he gets results. if he isnt on the grid next year, 75% of the grid shouldnt be either
Posted by 229 (85 days ago)
Last Edited 85 days ago
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
2 agree. 4 disagree.
Report Abuse
andrew it wont be like Mclaren, first of Ron dennis wont be there :) Secondly they will give Nando what he wants. Ferrari know he is the guy to win them world championships. why would the think of hiring a two time world champion to be the teams number 2 driver? if thats the case they should give a young guy the seat. he wont cause as much trouble (hopefully) and he will be alot cheaper!
Posted by 229 (85 days ago)
Last Edited 85 days ago
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
Andrew contracts mean nothing in F1 anymore. remember the Button Williams/BAR farce in 04. Fernando is 99.9% certain to be there, with Massa
Posted by 229 (85 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
its pretty obvious isnt it. He'll be in a Ferrari
Posted by 229 (85 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 2 disagree.
Report Abuse
Daniel, so two world titles against probably the greatest ever driver is nothing? id like to see what you call an achievement then
Posted by 229 (85 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
not sure about the DC-10. we have 4 of these erikson sky crane things that have water dump equipment on them. plus other choppers. i would go as far as saying that Kimi's interview sare the most watchable in sport
Posted by 229 (85 days ago)
Last Edited 85 days ago
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
Report Abuse
i feel for everyone in California. here in Australia we have the same prob with bushfires, look at victoria earlier this year, 200 odd people died. i think Massa is a great driver and ferrari are missing him, but i dont think he is a team leader like a Michael or even a Fernando. you cant learn how to lead people, you are born with it. but Massa is a great driver, hope to seem him back soon.
Posted by 229 (85 days ago)
Have Your Say Comments
Have Your Say Comments
1 agrees. 1 disagrees.
Report Abuse
what im trying to say overall is that Kimi while quick, needs everything goin is way to motivate him and to perform. Alonso and Hamilton do not, they try 100 percent all the time. Half of the time Kimi's mind is elsewhere, and he doesnt lead the team, which is what he was hired to do. i like the guy, he ads alot to F1, i always look forward to his interviews and when he is on it, he is fun to watch but that doesnt happen enough. Saying the car isnt good enough isnt a good enough excuse, last year Massa beat him in what was the best car. Kimi should have won the title. Ferrari need a guy they can build a team around and that isnt Kimi im afriad
Posted by 229 (85 days ago)
Last Edited 85 days ago
Have Your Say Comments

Have Your Say Comments
Page 7 of 18
« 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  »
Have Your Say Comments

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.
 
Site Map
© 1999 - 2009 Crash Media Group
The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.

Contact Crash.Net  |  Advertise on Crash.Net  |  Our Privacy Policy  |  About Crash.Net  |  Get News Feeds  |  Need a Website?

Find car reviews on sports cars such as Ferrari, BMW, Porsche and many more.