Crash.Net User: JJJ

Comments rating: 890
Position in rating: 181

Show Comments on:


April 11, 2014 3:11 PM

F1 » Red Bull appeal success ‘would be bad for the sport’

RBR consistently pushes the boundaries of the regulations as we know...To some extent that's what F1 is about, but I dislike it when it spills over in the political side of things. What I don't necessarily get however is why this fuel flow meter is necessary in the first place. If the issue is not using more than 100 litres of fuel surely there are other ways to regulate it. Apparently there is also regulation on how much fuel maybe used per hour, to which I would say...why for F's sake? If a team wants to burn through the most of their fuel in the first part of the race and turn the engine way down towards the end why not let them, if anything it might make for some interesting situations with different strategies being played out. Can't help but feel this FIA micromanagement is going overboard in F1.


April 12, 2014 1:35 PM
Last Edited 478 days ago

F1 » New US team awarded FIA Formula 1 licence it all comes down to cold hard cash I thought I'd see if I could find Gene's net worth somewhere and it is estimated at 250 million. That won't be enough cause over the first few years he should realistically expect to spend about all of that footing the bill for the running costs of the team, unless he can find some other big investors/sponsors which, looking at the USF1 saga is unlikely to happen. The man is probably smart enough not to spend a sizeable chunk of his fortune on a pipe dream so I expect if the team comes to fruition at all its existence will be shortlived, can't play in the billionaire boys club with a couple hundred mill...But of course as a fan I still like to see them try cause more cars on the grid is better.


April 11, 2014 2:47 PM

F1 » Kobayashi: Caterham to take a couple of new parts to China

The bad news for Caterham is that even the complete ****box that Lotus built this year still has more pace than their car (when it runs that is, but then Caterham have also had a few retirements already). The good news is the Lotus and Sauber are so slow this year they may just have a chance to nick a point somewhere, but even then it will still likely be for 10th place at best in the constructor's.


April 10, 2014 5:16 PM

F1 » Ericsson losing half a second in weight

Vergne posted a picture on his twitter of a McDonald's in Bahrain accompanied by the text: "Diet is finished...hehehe". In other words I think too much is made from this issue, although I do think that in a sport where the competive areas are controlled so much by the FIA (eg no real engine competition, no multiple tyre manufacturers etc...) it's kind of strange to make driver weight a potential competive benefit at all. In other words some of these drivers may be posturing a bit to lobby for a change but I do agree with them that their weight and size should not be a significant performance determinator when it's so easy for the FIA to make a little change in the regulations so that it doesn't have to be.


April 09, 2014 8:21 PM
Last Edited 481 days ago

F1 » Bahrain F1 test results - day two: 9 April

It's a strange thing that seemed to run pretty good in Australia (for their standards) but then Malaysia came around and Caterham pummeled them...and so I thought as Malaysia is a bit more representative for the rest of the year that's what the rest of the year would bring. But now the thing shows some pace again. The Sauber on the other hand...yikes. If Lotus hadn't fallen from grace even harder than them we'd all be talking about them as the failure of the year. I'd feel bad for Giedo for changing to a 3rd driver seat at a supposedly faster team that turns out not to be that much faster at all instead of hanging on to his raceseat at the back of the grid, but then of course in the bigger scheme of things he's still a lucky man to have that gig.


April 09, 2014 8:05 PM
Last Edited 481 days ago

F1 » Ferrari ends testing early in Bahrain

Taipan: I was actually (...) and quite a surprising answer.
To be fair kinda daft to think that the teams would make two cars immediately in the 1st place...Many shake down their car on the first test or just days before, plus if it would turn out that the car has some major issues and you've built two before testing you're stuck with two miscreants instead of one. I don't think the fact that Kimi ran the race with a damaged chassis shows he can't tell if the car is running well or not. Maybe he did tell the team the car wasn't to his liking but he also has to assume that what the team gives him at the weekend is sound and make the best out of it. Also he can't really judge if the car is losing a few tenths cause of some obscure damage to the chassis as he's only been coupled to FA for 3 races, so it's not like he can say 'hey I'm usually faster than him and now I'm a couple of tenths off so something MUST be wrong with the car'.


April 09, 2014 8:44 PM
Last Edited 481 days ago

F1 » Bottas sure Williams hasn’t missed best chance

Taz: Reckon he'll get the better of Massa over the season.
I reckon if he was better he'd already shown it by now, but it's 2:1 Massa in quali and in races so far, although really the two seem reamrkably equally matched. I've said this before about Bottas but I just don't think he has the kind of talent to be among the very best, also based on what I've seen from him when he was paired to Bianchi in F3 (Bianchi had more pace, his problem is making erratic mistakes). I think Bottas can have a good carreer in F1 and if someone gives him a dominant car and a mediocre teammate he can even win races, but IMO, he's not the next great fin 'everyone' makes him out to be. I would have liked to see him try his luck in GP2 or WSBR instead of taking the (understandable) option to sit out a year and take a shortcut to F1 with Williams. To me it shows that he wasn't confident enough to take on GP2 knowing that it would hurt his chances if he'd end up looking mediocre.

Page 9 of 67
« 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.