Crash.Net User: rbr46

Comments rating: 1508
Position in rating: 98

Show Comments on:

rbr46

March 11, 2015 7:02 AM

F1 » Roberto Merhi lands second Manor F1 drive


richard:
rbr46: I'm still of the opinion that they will be lucky to race. 15 people were sent to Australia my Manor. 107% is a real challenge for them.
despite you name ...RBR and rossi's number....werent you recently claiming that you worked for marussia, yet here you are now criticising them. odd!
I created this account when I worked for RBR, and yes I worked for Marussia until June 2014. Not bitter, this current set up wont last long, 50% of their budget is based on the prize money, its not sustainable, its a fact. Would you like evidence of my work? Facebook, linked in - no problem.

rbr46

March 11, 2015 9:26 AM

F1 » van der Garde wins court battle over Sauber drive


throttlemeister:
rbr46: Has VDG thought about the possibility of Sauber's future being jeopardised if he were to race? Then he is back to square 1, looking for a drive. No way will he be driving this weekend.
Give me 1 single reason why VDG should have any obligation, moral or otherwise, to put the teams interest over that of his own after the team screwed him over despite having a contract? It's about time a driver has the balls to stand up and force a team in F1 to open their eyes and make them realize a contract is a contract, not some worthless piece of paper filled with good intentions.
You didn't get my point. What I'm saying is that if Sauber were to go bankrupt as a result of this then he wont have a drive, therefore what is the point of this? He is fighting for a drive and of course he should fight for his own interests. Yes contracts shouldn't be broken.


Page 5 of 55
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.