Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: 1188
Position in rating: 87

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

July 16, 2014 6:00 PM

F1 » German Grand Prix preview


From Germany onwards nobody will run FRIC, unless there is somebody that wants to do a Red Bull and challenge Whiting, my guess is that RBR would love for Mercedes to undertake that challenge in the hope of them (RBR) having the chance to attend a court of appeal with their lawyer and get on equal terms with Mercedes.

107SS2009

July 17, 2014 9:14 AM

F1 » Renault expecting performance boost in Germany


1JETZ/ Beningly, Yes the three forced induction ICE’S produced this year are (as has been expected by those that fully understands this business) closer in performance (ICE power output) than last year’s NA V8’S. Explanation, but first a note, (reliability problems which will prevent an ICE from producing its full output for the duration of a race, although it will make all the difference in a race should not confuse this subject). The NA ICE V8’S were air restricted, this restriction was capped by the mandated max RPM limit. The forced induction ICE’S are fuel flow (KG/H) restricted at a max RPM. This is technically exactly why they were (as expected) to be closer in their power output. This is because scientifically there is a limit as to what can be extracted from a given amount of fuel permitted to be burned. Another note, the NA V8’S had a slightly lower fuel flow (KG/H) requirements then the present permitted forced induction ICE’S have. To be continued.

107SS2009

July 16, 2014 6:57 PM

F1 » German Grand Prix preview


The FFS were always passed as legal and guaranteed to be within acceptable tolerances as proved by the court of appeal. what has been updated is their tempering-with. And yes, I agree that as things now stand the stewards are not supposed to pass any car legal to race if fitted with FRIC. from now on.

107SS2009

July 17, 2014 9:52 AM

F1 » Renault expecting performance boost in Germany


Continued, yes the electric power is capped, but regardless that is where the advantage is derived from. Explanation, the max storage and output of the ES (batteries) is 4MJ/lap, the harvesting from K is max 2MJ/LAP, while its output is a max of 4MJ/lap, the K alone can never fully charge the ES, the harvesting from H is unlimited, while its output is also unlimited, the H can spin (spool-up) the turbo, charge the ES as well as power the K, although the K max MJ’S output per lap still applies to the output of H-to-K it being unlimited is where the advantage of max electric power per lap can be had from. To be continued.

107SS2009

July 17, 2014 10:39 AM

F1 » Renault expecting performance boost in Germany


Continued, “Different systems remarkably similar” and “the integration of the various systems” The differences are such that can make for a winning package plus impacting in no small way on reliability and the effect on the car as a package. Although it will be a pleasure to explain these things, it is not possible to do so on here as such with permission of CRASH I recommend a visit to matt somersf1 powerunit architecture, scroll down right side of page and click on subject/s. And finally both 1jez and beningly appreciates your disagreeing true a dialogue instead of hiding behind the disagree button, men with balls I call you/in my book.

107SS2009

July 17, 2014 10:54 AM

F1 » German Grand Prix preview


And there are still people on here that doubt/ed that this had all the trademark of the onehalfcancerleftinF1. I am saying this despite being the first on here to admit that FRIC was always in conflict with the rules, as much as are the split turbo with a clutched MGU-H in-between the turbine and compressor.


Page 10 of 955
« 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.