Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -3903
Position in rating: 7848

Show Comments on:


August 19, 2015 6:13 PM

F1 » Ferrari confirms Kimi Raikkonen for 2016

Although as was the case with Tiapan I too was surprised that FERRARI retained Kimi, their decision only means that they believed they had no better Alternative for Kimi for the time being (next year), regardless of what others may think, in short FERRARI must have believed that Bottas, Riccardo, hulkenberg and Verstappen all of whom all were being pushed at their door by the usual F1 media were not potential alternatives for next year. He who pays the piper is what counts.


August 19, 2015 5:09 PM

F1 » Rosberg: It’s all still to play for...

richard: ilione. ty is spot on with his comments. seeing as it was only 8 years ago that heiki was told to let lulu through, you must not have been following f1 for very long. oh, and by the way, nico has had to accede on at least 3 occasions, as well as not being allowed to pass lulu when he was faster.
direct me to source please , and I don't mean Taipan says. Not that I doubt what Taipan is saying but he could be mistaken.
Taipan is as he usually is when quoting formula 1 history, spot-on.


August 19, 2015 9:12 AM

F1 » Honda prepares update but braces for penalties

Keith Goodyear:
btr100: Elswhere I read that with this update Honda is aiming to match the power output of the Ferrari engine, allegedly most powerful (with Mercedes) engine on the grid. They seem to have a habit of aiming too high, these Honda people, don't you think? :)
You can never aim too high[\blockquote Wise people tend not to shout out laud about how high they aim, because they know too well that the higher you aim the harder it can drop down right on your face. Looks like Arai and Abitebeul has been petting each other on the back lately.

Page 12 of 1309
« 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.