Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: 961
Position in rating: 97

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

April 11, 2014 1:42 PM

F1 » Red Bull appeal success ‘would be bad for the sport’


And reverting back to the original argument/s from on the old thread page/s those from on there who are back on here (this page) can rest assured that technically speaking the readings the teams use for their fuel flow measurements namely that by injector mapping reading can never be as accurate as the FIA homologated FFM for the simple reason that the tolerances of the FFM are much smaller and also because the parameters it measures are much more.

107SS2009

April 11, 2014 2:42 PM

F1 » Red Bull appeal success ‘would be bad for the sport’


Richard, the exact wording said found to have “threads drilled-out”, now let’s sort this out by common sense, the FIA does not say where the threads are, they can be mounting threads as well as fuel line threads (in and out), as the threads where “drilled-out” it means the threads were female, the FIA did not say that the drilling of the threads effected the flow, it said that the FFM was modified which should not have been, they also said that 95% of FFM problems were on Renault engine cars. Giveway, keep dreaming,

107SS2009

April 11, 2014 12:31 PM

F1 » Red Bull appeal success ‘would be bad for the sport’


Why is the term “fool” regarded as arrogant when the rules says that the fuel flow measurements are those only according to the FIA homologated FFM? It should be remembered that anybody running on track did that by agreeing to those rules/regulations, what RBR did was tantamount to moving the goal posts while the game was in progress, And to the attention of the one full of it, remember that arguing with the ref as they say in rugby, 10meters back or sin bin. Mix2000, tempering with the FFM was not in the interest of the media or those “fools” that’s why RBR never disclosed it to the media or to the “fools”. Now last I heard is the F1A might turn their attention to the fuel used by STR because while they are sponsored and registering their fuel as being that made by CESPSA they have been found out to be using TOTAL as RBR use, in sort it looks like RBR can only move forward like a snake.

107SS2009

April 11, 2014 1:26 PM

F1 » Red Bull appeal success ‘would be bad for the sport’


I have read a report saying that the FIA found out that FFM’s used on Renault engine cars has been modified by (the exact words) the threads having been drilled-out and that 95% of FFM’S problems were on Renault engine cars, the FIA said that from Spain onwards no cars will be allowed on the grid with the FFM modified in any way other than that as supplied by Gill and calibrated by Galibra.

107SS2009

April 11, 2014 6:13 AM

F1 » Rosberg’s pride at silencing ‘very unfair’ critics


Mark, so we are agreed that "changing the regulations mid-season is unfair" but "you fear that many fans will lose interest and that will hurt promoters" but on the other hand you have decided to be part of the "effective way to be heard by those in charge" well your position (a right of yours) still falls short of saying what you would like those in charge to do about your problem. those in charge can do one of the following things, let the season progress as per the regulations that not only everybody on the grid agreed too but everybody had a chance to start on said regulations on equal terms, or move the goal posts while the season is in progress to make your likes a shade happier. Where I come from they say that no part of the cow goes to waste, which means that your likes should remember that there is another side to your problem.

107SS2009

April 11, 2014 8:10 AM

F1 » Ericsson losing half a second in weight


Here is a list of drivers weights from last year. Bottas 70kg, rosberg 71, riccardo 68, hulk 74, massa 59, di resta 74, vettel 58, kimi 70, Alonso 68, button 70, vergne 73, grosjean 71, pic 60, Lulu 68, perez 64, gutierez 63, wbber 75, maldo 66. Since then some are trying hard to starve themselves with one reported to having been hospitalised and one declaring he considering cutting of his balls. Every 1 kg of extra car weight on track is said to equate to 0.035 seconds per lap. Again the rules are being blamed for the advantage/disadvantage and not those that produce the cars, the problem was/is twofold, last year when teams were able to produce cars weighing less than the minimum weight the complain was a disadvantage in the way they can play with ballast, but now the complaining extra weight because they are unable to produce underweight cars and add ballast.


Page 13 of 895
« 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.