Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -2983
Position in rating: 7560

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

May 10, 2015 8:04 PM

F1 » Raikkonen bemoans ‘disturbing’ Williams tendencies


It’s got nothing to do with the Williams car (in particular/only with the Williams car), the same thing Happened to Vettel behind Bottas in Bahrain, the same thing also happened to Lulu today behind Vettel, the latest low front nose regulations produces destructive dirty aero for the car following at close distance. Kimi’s problem/dificulty in overtaking Bottas was a combination of that dirty air and diminishing tyres plus the nature of the track. Contrary to what is being said on here, if instead of Kimi it was Vettel, it would have ended the same way. .

107SS2009

May 11, 2015 8:13 AM

F1 » Frustrated Hamilton counts cost of bad start


cecedecat:
2secondsperlap: That start was pedestrian by Lewis. Shame really, it would have been nice to see if Lewis could have run down Nico and pass him or get him on the undercut.
Doubtful as he caught up with Seb and couldn't pass him, so he'd of needed helping strategy to do it - just as he did with Vettel.
Lulu was actually given race strategy help by the team, in fact the team compromised Nico to help Lulu. But where did that got them (the team)?, it got then one of Lulus famous team-work brain farts, just follow what he said after the race about obeying/cooperating with his team and race engineer.

107SS2009

May 10, 2015 9:35 PM

F1 » Frustrated Hamilton counts cost of bad start


After doing some hooning at the start (a la Australia hotel car park 2010) Lulu had let Vettel past and was lucky Bottas didn’t follow suite. After 6 laps it was obvious that Lulu was not going to be able to get round the FS15T under DRS, the medium high speed corners doing particular damage to the aero of the car behind, thanks to the new low nose regulations, we have seen a clear pattern where Lulu would close-up and push, then drop back the following lap, likely a combination of energy harvesting and tyre preservation, it also illustrated the difference in energy recovery system as it is understood that the Mercedes takes more management then the FERRARI.

107SS2009

May 11, 2015 8:18 AM

F1 » Raikkonen bemoans ‘disturbing’ Williams tendencies


richard:
ProfessorX: the best thing Ferrari can do for next year is to take Lewis Hamilton away from Mercedes. as for "vortices" that's a nothing but a buzzword (in this context), the wake or eddies behind the car are so much more damaging to the car behind than vortices which are used to enhance the effectiveness of the air pressures over the surfaces of the car.
nutty. another of your fails? these wings require clean air to perform properly. now if you are following a car that is creating multiple vorticies with their front wing and other appendages, your own front wing cannot run in clean air and is less effective, causing the tyre problems etc, as evidenced by lulu, nico and seb all mentioning it. but hey...what do they know? they arent professors are they?
The much learned Profs will never actually learn F1 matters.

107SS2009

May 11, 2015 8:01 AM

F1 » Red Bull ‘writes off’ 2015, urges Renault to take risks


I talked/touched upon about Renault’s F1 operation budget. Something of which some/most on here fail to calculate upon is politicians (the real ones) interference/s within a going concern. Facts show the following. The French government has a 15% share in Renault, but strange as it may sound, those 15% shares translates into an estimated 28% of voting rights, enough for blocking vote.


Page 15 of 1239
« 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.