Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -190
Position in rating: 7044

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

November 24, 2014 8:36 PM

F1 » Wolff expects Hamilton contract talks in December


britain1:
WBS: Hamilton is not needed , so he may not be offered the gigantic retainer he imagines , Rosberg can win the title for them . They know that now .
Remember what Brundle said yesterday " Mercedes wanted Lewis to win the tittle over Nico" . And his reason was " Lewis is box office" So yes Nico can win the tittle with the WO6 but why not have someone who can win in their car who is so much more marketable.
To confirm how much “box office” and “marketable” Lulu is go visit today’s mail online or daily f1.

107SS2009

November 25, 2014 9:59 PM

F1 » McLaren ‘quite a bit’ behind – Vandoorne


.mclaren And Honda. These teething problems belongs to Honda. Yasuhisa Arai says that “when I was at Jerez earlier this year I noticed how many issues the teams faced”, “that these teething problems it is facing at this first test are no different to those endured by rival manufacturers at the start of 2014”. The difference is rival manufacturers wasn’t anywhere near to watch others teething problems when they first run their new PU’S, so they were unable to learn from others mistakes. “The PU ran is still under development, it is not what we will race”. That sounds like Honda is still not ready.

107SS2009

November 25, 2014 10:33 PM

F1 » McLaren ‘quite a bit’ behind – Vandoorne


Honda forays into F1. In the 80’S and the 90’s in their F1 forays Honda had a proud history. But less so in their 2000 F1 forays. Will this their latest comeback be more successful than their 2000 try? Up to now (their first on track test) the rumours that were circulating about them having fallen behind schedule in their PU development seems to have been correct.


Page 18 of 1093
« 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.