Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -3657
Position in rating: 7782

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

June 29, 2015 6:38 AM

F1 » Hamilton: I’d rather anyone won but Nico…


mrfill:
classact1: As for superstar not being popular, just checkout Silverstone nextweekend.
No, check out Goodwood this weekend and see the reception Valentino Rossi got. That, sir, is popular....
MRFILL, If there is anybody that can learn something from the popularity that resulted/shown to the doctor from the Goodwood meeting and what total dedication to the sports is all about it is exactly Lulu, as All the respect and enthusiasm shown to a foreigner was right at his tax free home.

107SS2009

June 29, 2015 6:20 AM

F1 » Hamilton: I’d rather anyone won but Nico…


janhein:
107SS2009:
richard:
Gilles:The only difference is that Lewis said it, all the other drivers think it and nobody would even bat an eyelid. As the saying goes, the first person you have to beat in your team mate. This is a non-story, only because it is Lewis do we get the negative comments, if it was Alonso or Vettel nobody would give a damn
no the difference is that no other driver would be stupid enough to say such a thing. there is absolutely no way you would ever hear ferdi or seb saying that!
As I said, I never heared any driver ever saying what Lulu said re his team mate and team. you have never heard it and maybe it has never been said.love it. Janheino, If I didn’t heard it said probability is that with the exception of a few such as Jack and Richard nobody did on here. Taipan was a breath of fresh air on here compared to some freshly whitewashedtombs which I am sure you do regognise when you see o

107SS2009

June 28, 2015 8:49 PM

F1 » Hamilton: I’d rather anyone won but Nico…


richard:
Gilles: The only difference is that Lewis said it, all the other drivers think it and nobody would even bat an eyelid. As the saying goes, the first person you have to beat in your team mate. This is a non-story, only because it is Lewis do we get the negative comments, if it was Alonso or Vettel nobody would give a damn
no the difference is that no other driver would be stupid enough to say such a thing. there is absolutely no way you would ever hear ferdi or seb saying that!
As I said, I never heared any driver ever saying what Lulu said re his team mate and team.

107SS2009

June 29, 2015 8:05 AM

F1 » FIA moves to quash suspicions of fuel advantages


continued, target being the same. things explained, they would have been able to use more fuel (injected) at lower rpm and still meet the targeted 100kg/h max. the rule saying 100kkg/h max at 10.5rpm means less fuel can be injected at mandated higher max rpm to meet the target of 100kg/h max. remember that, more air more fuel more power. on the other hand, less air less fuel but more rpm will not match the power output of the preferred path they would have took/chosen.

107SS2009

June 29, 2015 7:53 AM

F1 » FIA moves to quash suspicions of fuel advantages


Here4, This subject possible use of hydrogen I touched upon on here was around January when a respected technical person Rosario Zorzi gave a scientific explanation as to the possibility of its use by Mercedes on a Italain language technical site that I am a registered user and participant off. I might be wrong but I believe that you might have not fully exploted/went through these technical sites because of the need to translate, the following guide might help to elevate that problem. For an english transalated version try the following. is hydrogen the secret of meredes? Friday January 16 2015 click on first site, go to post 9 by Mesteno, read carfuly and enjoy. A note here might help some more, the more air that can be pushed/boosted into the engine, about 3 bar at present, the more fuel that must be used, if it wasn’t for the FIA 100kg/h at 10.5K RPM rule these engines would have been set-up to produce max power at much lower rpm, with more boost,more fuel injected, target being th


Page 19 of 1289
« 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.