Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: 908
Position in rating: 127

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

July 31, 2014 8:53 PM

F1 » Wolff: Team orders masked reliability problems


“In the military he (Paddy) would probably get a promotion” I don’t think so, the promotion in the military would have been handed to LULU AS AN ACT OF LOYALTY AND RESPECT TO DUTY shown to Paddy and the team in general to a set of team rules agreed on called (a team protocol)!. But seriously, I have no doubt and all should rest assured that regardless of all the frantic mix-and-stir sweeteners dished-out by Mercedes bosses since the end of the Hungary race, Mercedes as a team will make doubly sure that they will assert back their status quo (authority) as to who gives orders and who obeys them, and that nobody can be part of the team unless he fully comply with team orders/requests.

107SS2009

July 31, 2014 9:50 PM

F1 » Wolff: Mercedes ‘comfortable’ with Hamilton’s stance


Mick, both Vettel and Massa have failed to comply with/defied their respective team authority/requests/orders, as such their integrity in the eyes of their respective teams as regards their loyalties to their teams can never be trusted again, people in authority does not and cannot give a second chance in such matters. Here4thesun, I for one never had any doubt that regardless of the mix-and-stir sweeteners having been dished-out by the Mercedes bosses that they will reassertion their authority in no time at all as regards of who gives orders and who obeys them.

107SS2009

July 31, 2014 6:57 AM

F1 » Wolff: Mercedes ‘comfortable’ with Hamilton’s stance


Bright light cubed, Your brightness must be blinding you, The Euro 90m 3 year contract is a requested one and not as you are saying “an offer” and may I be permitted to remind you that it was me that first broke that out on here. And yes Lauda, the man is more prone to say-it like he feels it, same tendency as Lulu there, the problem is what is said is often licked-back like all was licked back in the lie-gate saga.

107SS2009

July 31, 2014 1:44 PM
Last Edited 18 hours ago

F1 » Wolff: Mercedes ‘comfortable’ with Hamilton’s stance


“You (I) don’t seem to grasp the concept of answering simple questions” the way I answer questions is a prerogative of mine, and you and your likes liking or not doesn’t bother me at all. By your 2 questions you were trying to divert the wrong doings of Lulu to the possibility of said wrongdoings being committed by his team mate. We can here only talk about what happened and not what would have been by others. As I explained Lulu is a liar (proven with facts), a dishonest person (disposed to lie, cheat or steal, not worthy of trust), a man of no principle (decision/s taken based on expediency rather than on values, morals on what has been mutually agreed on as a team.

107SS2009

July 31, 2014 9:48 AM

F1 » Wolff: Mercedes ‘comfortable’ with Hamilton’s stance


roBo1/Rob, Thanks for a genuine reminder, I really do appreciate your honesty on here, something that only I (your front line sparring partner of many years) and a handful of other old timers from on here can. That yellow stick-it-on note was all the time screaming at me (never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience). My bad, my problem started right after the Hungary flag fell where I could clearly see the sudden migration/influx to on here, some from on 247 and some from on here itself with the ability of (parthenogenesis=able to zoo themselves), I could that early visualize this site being dragged through the gutter 247 has been dragged through just for a gain in numbers, even the Brooklyn bad man and his Jackson had the gall to drop in after his fiasco of a litigation against this site. Again, thanks. Sunny.

107SS2009

July 31, 2014 8:41 AM

F1 » Wolff: Mercedes ‘comfortable’ with Hamilton’s stance


Mr bright light, when Lulu disobeyed his team and hi-jacked NR’S strategy he was being dishonest as can be, because he was part and parcel of the agreed upon protocol of the Mercedes team. Even so you quoting a much more credible newspaper than the British stuff, you still twisted the EURO 90M 3 year LULU REQUEST INTO AN OFFER BY THE TEAM. So much for your correctness and honesty on here.


Page 2 of 960
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.