Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -537
Position in rating: 7121

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

January 30, 2015 10:44 AM

F1 » Mercedes shows F1 title defending W06


rbr46: Perhaps you should proof read or peer review "your" posts.
I did and couldn’t trace me claiming that the news I quoted are mine. Hope it’s not a case of you being irritated by reading something that you wouldn’t like to reading. And as to you considering that CRASH NET “Is clearly not the place to keep up-to-date with current news” why come waste your time over at CRASH NET?.

107SS2009

January 30, 2015 10:14 AM

F1 » Mercedes shows F1 title defending W06


rbr46: That you like to present all information as your own when in reality all your comments are clearly based from other news websites. For instance the first comment on this article, that was pure hilarity.
Information as against opinion, as the name implies is/have to be gotten somewhere, that applies to everybody on God’s green earth. And your information is based on what?

107SS2009

January 30, 2015 8:58 AM

F1 » Mercedes shows F1 title defending W06


What is going on at CRASH NET, is it moderating? Rosberg ran a total of 18 laps in between rain and hail yesterday at Silverstone. Bravo Mr Horner for trying your best “spice” in trying to deviate attention from your most pressing problems by blabbing about Vettel. The RBR RB11 has failed the FIA mandatory crash test, Newey is said to be incandescent with rage as this late crash test failure means that the team cannot currently run the new RB11 car in the test at Jerez on Sunday.

107SS2009

January 30, 2015 9:19 AM

F1 » Mercedes shows F1 title defending W06


rbr46:
107SS2009: What is going on at CRASH NET, is it moderating? Rosberg ran a total of 18 laps in between rain and hail yesterday at Silverstone. Bravo Mr Horner for trying your best “spice” in trying to deviate attention from your most pressing problems by blabbing about Vettel. The RBR RB11 has failed the FIA mandatory crash test, Newey is said to be incandescent with rage as this late crash test failure means that the team cannot currently run the new RB11 car in the test at Jerez on Sunday.
Your point is? Crash is clearly not the place to keep up to date with current news. Hence all the information you stated is on other news sites and not on Crash.
I made my point, And now I may to ask "What is your point?"

107SS2009

January 30, 2015 4:15 AM

F1 » Horner: Vettel nearly quit F1


richard:
CJD: just wait for an Hamilton or Button article ... the all their fans will pop up.. i tell you .. "seb appologists" are mostly defending seldom offending .. just wait for Ham fans ... .. i think a four time WDC is allowed to think about quitting .. has gotten a father of a daughter.. has broken quite a few records ...
dont worry, "i'm new to the site..." combined with bad spelling, means that mr jones works for the civil service. hi there RGT!!!! Richard, Incredible that he still manages/is allowed to multi name post on CRASH NET!

107SS2009

January 30, 2015 7:47 AM

F1 » Renault seeking ‘at least five wins’ in F1 2015


Mercedes is not the only one using a split turbo system. In Canada the Mercedes problem was the brakes and not the ERS, although Rosberg had less harvesting due to the brake Bias being shifted to the front more than normal, the brakes (rear) were still harvesting although much less than normal, to that must be added the Mercedes clear advantage over the others, which is the (MGU-H) which according to the rules is the only source of unlimited power and which was not effected whatsoever by the brake problem encountered. The ERS harvesting by the rear brake (input to the ES, is limited by the rules to only half of what the ES is allowed to contribute/supply to the MGU-K.


Page 2 of 1121
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.