Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: 937
Position in rating: 105

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

March 29, 2014 6:23 AM

F1 » FIA rejects Horner fuel flow suggestion


BT33:
107SS2009:
BT33: Absolute nonsense Fabrice Lom - get rid of the fuel flow rate.
That's a load of BS, The only way forward is like they say in rugby, arguing with the ref, back 10 metres or sin bin.
I'm not arguing with the ref (RBR is doing that) I disagree with the fuel flow rate rule.
Ok, you are not, so do you agree with RBR arguing with the ref? and yes likes and dislikes is a right of yours, but RBR was part of the lot (technical working group) that agreed to the present rules and that includes the fuel flow restriction, so how come now they saying there is no need for it, one thing is for sure, the game cannot be played by the RBR selective rules interpretations in accordance to their needs.

107SS2009

March 28, 2014 9:54 PM

F1 » Red Bull could risk FIA wrath again


Quoting from AMuS (German), “Today it came to light that apparently three Renault engine teams made changes/modified to the fuel supply to and from the (£4500 each) sensor, one of the teams is RBR. My opinion only, the FIA today have pretty much indicated it will be their way or the highway over the fuel flow sensor issue and that RBR have no chance of winning their appeal against their DQ in AUSTALIA.

107SS2009

March 29, 2014 7:05 AM

F1 » Red Bull could risk FIA wrath again


The FIA is saying that the sensor is OK, it's RBR that is saying that, the sensor is no good, the sensor readings are not good, the sensor failed, there is no need for a sensor, the FIA must find a better way of measuring flow, the 100kg fuel load for a race alone is the way to go, the FIA should use two or three sensors, the FIA was wrong in requesting RBR to lower their fuel flow, the FIA fuel flow readings were no good, only their injectors flow reading were good, RBR had a right to use their own mapped and calibrated measuring system as against the official FIA measuring system.


Page 21 of 891
« 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.