Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -2121
Position in rating: 7330

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

March 12, 2015 8:12 PM

F1 » van der Garde wins seat as Sauber appeal rejected


jamie033: Monisha Kaltenborn was made to eat her words from last year. Somebody from Sky asked her about the standing contracts for Sutil and VDG towards the end of the season and she replied with a wry smile "we decide who drive our cars". best thing Peter Sauber does is fire this failed wonna be lawyer. she thinks she's operating from Mumbai, and the races are in New Delhi and karatchi!!!
And who do you think should decide who drives their cars?

107SS2009

March 12, 2015 8:50 PM

F1 » van der Garde wins seat as Sauber appeal rejected


When this thread is nearing the one hundred posts the vast majority which are for and against the subject here comes this “FULL OF IT” accusing a fellow poster of clearly taking sides and when asked if he the “FULL OF IT” was/is taking sides he the “full of it” retorts by saying that the fellow poster is being helped changing nappies, this here “FULL OF IT” IS truly FULL OF IT.

107SS2009

March 12, 2015 8:04 PM

F1 » van der Garde wins seat as Sauber appeal rejected


On a totally different theme and off topic but interesting while we wait for the action. Rumours from down under says that Manor Marussia (the proper name) might be thwarted from running their cars as their engine software is not working their computers which contained the relevant software were wiped clean. And this is not through the bugging of the FIA offices!.

107SS2009

March 13, 2015 8:05 AM

F1 » Mercedes dominant as Sauber, Manor skip FP1


The recent migrating influx witnessed at CRASH is a new trend other F1 websites endured, these migrants have one thing in common, they all pretend that they follow F1 but in reality they are all oneeyedfanboys of someone or something. Their migrating trend/patterns follows that of birds, they move from areas of lower or decreasing “resources” (what they would like to hear) to areas of high or increasing “resources” (what they would like to hear). As a F1follower of many more moons then I can remember it never for a moment accoutred to me to stop following the sports whatever the situation was.

107SS2009

March 12, 2015 7:09 PM

F1 » van der Garde wins seat as Sauber appeal rejected


I quoted “Charlie Whiting to the judge” about the issue of FIA super licences, # A super licences is renewable yearly through ASM as long as the holder is provided with a racing seat, if the holder/driver have no seat/is not provided with a seat he have no super licences. And this on here FULLOFIT is not taking sides on this matter, but "Richard clearly is" That is why I told Richard that we got to a point where it is useless to talk this subject over any more on here.

107SS2009

March 12, 2015 2:37 PM

F1 » van der Garde wins seat as Sauber appeal rejected


richard: latest news is that vdg did not apply for a superlicence, and that he was told in early feb that he was sacked, also for disclosing confidential info. he now says that he can get a superlicence but the crb would then have to rule on it before he can sit in a car. so despite "contracts" it appears that guido may in part be responsible for his own misfortune. he knew what was required and took no steps to ensure that he was qualified to drive!
Richard, That's why I hinted in the other thread this morning that Giedo could be in breach of his contract with Sauber. On here we got to a point were it is useless arguing this subject any more, it is useless trying to say who is wrong and who is right, we have a driver who is insisting to drive and the team doesn't want him too and he is still trying to force himself on the team, not something seen often, best to wait and see what happens (the outcome).


Page 22 of 1191
« 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.