Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -537
Position in rating: 7121

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

January 29, 2015 1:29 PM

F1 » Horner: Vettel nearly quit F1


Horner has a hell of a lot to worry about, so much that it could be he was trying to deflect attention away from his and RBR most pressing problems at the moment. RBR goes to crash test their car today, if it does not pass the test today they will be forced to either miss the first test or test with a 2014 chassis. Unless a chassis passes the mandatory FIA crash test it is not allowed to go testing.

107SS2009

January 29, 2015 10:01 AM

F1 » Horner: Vettel nearly quit F1


Vettel went through a lot during 2014 season, could be more than some can calculate, no doubt about that, but the way he handled it all was remarkable indeed. Vettel is the one with less to worry about, because time is on his side compared to the top drivers on the grid. And for those super fast comparing Riccairdo to vettel, I will quote one reliable source who knows what he is talking about. (15 March Melbourne Australia 2014 20.47) “One thing we learned today is the importance of the software that controls the power at various parts of the system, Vettel’s Red Bull was practically un-drivable and Ricciardo’s was good for pole, although only tiny bits of software codes were the difference between these two”. But Horner is never going to talk about such things, even when he have nothing better to say.

107SS2009

January 29, 2015 9:20 AM

F1 » Horner: Prospect of 1000bhp in F1 is eye-watering


Rafal, You said “Prof is right here, bigger displacement does not mean higher fuel usage”. And I said, “My logic says the bigger the displacement the higher the fuel usage”. I asked you to explain. You said you did explain, but you guess it’s not enough for me. You explained F*** a**/zilch. And from the look of it there doesn’t seem any hope. Yours looks/sounds like the usual story on here where some drops in firing/talking about a subject but totally bare of any explanation as to what they are talking about.

107SS2009

January 28, 2015 7:56 PM

F1 » Force India to skip Jerez F1 test


Taz: "I hope that is not true, much as I dislike VJM's business practices FI are a great little team and punch way above their weight. Losing FI, Sauber or Lotus is just so bad for F1. Also means we'll end up with three cars.
" Taz, I too hope so. Add to what I quoted that Lotus is in no better position than Force India, trace and read the latest about the high risk of Maldonado imminent PDVSA $'S dry-up which might pull the team under.

107SS2009

January 28, 2015 8:10 PM

F1 » Renault reveals F1 engine ‘refresh’ for 2015


Mercedes, Renault and FERRARI will not make use of all available tokens this year for strategic reasons And not as some think because of time, their remaining tokens will be used as late in the seasons as rules will permit, the strategy is that they will then be in a better position technically to make use of them, the lateness of their use will mean that they will be sort of added to the 2016 25 available tokens.

107SS2009

January 28, 2015 7:59 PM

F1 » Force India to skip Jerez F1 test


goldenoldie:
107SS2009: The latest rumours doing the rounds read, that Mallya has been under increasing financial pressure over the winter break as the last power house of his empire (united breweries) is being chased to recover some of the estimated $2bn of debt owed by the defunct kingfisher airlines. And that Force India is close to collapse, suppliers haven’t been payed and this is the reason that the car is not ready for Jerez and that unless funds are injected into the team in the near future, Force India will be unlikely to make the grid in Australia and Malaysia.
It appears that there is already a potential buyer! YES RENAULT!!!!!!!!! And of course done with the three star PU!
Goldie, Yes I have read that and a bit more about Lotus.


Page 4 of 1121
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.