Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: 360
Position in rating: 332

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

October 22, 2014 2:51 PM

F1 » F1: McLaren confirms Michael departure


For quite some time now things were not looking rosy at mclaren with speculation continuing as to the stage the Honda engine is currently at, Alonso keep being mentioned but seems no closer to finalisation, it is emerging that Alonso is waiting on developments at Woking (for the dust to settle down) to ink the offered contract. some days ago I read an article of a major shake-up and gulling of staff at mclaren F1, this was a follow up to rumours that the relationship between founding partners of maclaren had collapsed by some Dennis actions which had upset Ojjeh, Ojjeh is now in talks with stroll about purchasing a controlling interest of mclaren from Mumtalakat holding, if this happens Dennis will be ousted from the Woking team in much the same way Whitmmarsh was removed.

107SS2009

October 22, 2014 8:20 AM

F1 » F1: Ferrari the only target - Massa


tommytrojan1:
107SS2009: The missed point in the Russian GP wasn’t the only lost opportunity by Williams this season they have missed many an opportunity this season. Declaring that the aim is to beat FERRARI for third place is admitting to a very big failure on their part as a team not to finish runner-up when having clearly the second fastest car on the grid.
Second fastest in a straight line, maybe....but as far as handling, I think I'd give second place to the Red Bulls.
You can give second place to whom ever you like and for whatever you like as its a right of your opinion. nobody will be right in not giving you that right.

107SS2009

October 22, 2014 2:23 PM

F1 » Force India against F1 engine war


Rob, first an addition to what I said in my last post, Big knives are all out to get Dennis (read elsewhere), secondly do not think that I was defending Dennis, he is a man that doesn’t deserve defending, what I was saying was that what he was saying was technically correct and I have no doubt about it. Re the time when the ICE part of the PU106A got the local fire trucks out while on the dyno and what I said, it is not easy to talk to you about it, what was on the dyno was the “ICE” at that time, they don’t run PU’S ion the dyno, without going into detail take my word that there is no way that anyone of the three engine manufacturer will get an advantage of 80/100hp from a given “ICE” specification (10500rpm/100kg/h fuel flow. Note that I am not saying that they are not getting that advantage from their PU.

107SS2009

October 22, 2014 1:37 PM

F1 » Force India against F1 engine war


hybridF1: I think he would since this team is always against blowing money. And I think Mercedes is undercutting this team due to cash issues. And I think Ron is right about inferior support for selective teams.
I already said this on another thread when Dennis spoke about his PU supply, In what Dennis was and is saying he is technically correct, but Mercedes are also within the rules and obligations in what they are supplying to Dennis.

107SS2009

October 22, 2014 11:04 AM

F1 » Caterham F1 owners ‘unable to fund company’


It has been called the CATERHAM SCAM and rightly so. As I said on another thread all the equipment was transferred from Sochi to Kolles base in Germany to keep them out of reach of the bailiffs until they transferred what they have left to a new set-up company aimed at dodging the bailiffs. What I find hard to understand is how the FIA is allowing their cars on the grid as both safety and the spirit of participating in F1 races “rules” cannot but be compromised in the situation they are in, and that’s not to mention the reputation given to FI racing.


Page 4 of 1048
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.