Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -2944
Position in rating: 7588

Show Comments on:

107SS2009

May 22, 2015 8:39 PM

F1 » Hamilton confirms three-year Mercedes F1 deal


Teams and drivers will not “discuss specifics” of their drivers contracts, that is not only normal but also as expected, but them they neither rebut the yearly publishing of drivers guaranteed basic salaries by specialist money sites/companies. The following is the latest from a well known money reputable site/company. Vettel 3 year deal basic, first year euro 33.4m, 2nd and 3rd years euro 30m guaranteed. Alonso 2 year deal basic euro 25.5m a year guaranteed. Lulu 3 year deal basic euro 20.9m a year guaranteed. note that this is pretty much the same 2014 basic guaranteed salary. (no cost of living increase here. I expect that any newly popped-up mushrooms on here will carry out their research and not ask for my source.

107SS2009

May 22, 2015 2:20 PM

F1 » Hamilton confirms three-year Mercedes F1 deal


Soundofspeed, Since you popped-up on here I never doubted your type will will take JA word and that of his bella compania to form your opinion on F1 matters. Re what you are claiming about what Whithmarsh having said “the offer would have made him the highest paid driver on the grid” a claim banded about by the likes of JA and bella compania and of which you are parroting on here today, the facts back than were that Lulu was told to take a pay cut amounting to one third of what he was being paid, from fifteen to ten million a year, the package for three years would have shot that up to 60m with bonuses which are not a .guaranteed, as I said, back than the situation was “take it or leave it” today the situation was the same “take it or leave it”, the difference today is Lulu gained the 10 percent commission his ex management would have had to be paid, but he didn’t even got a cost of living rise from Mercedes.

107SS2009

May 22, 2015 7:50 AM

F1 » Hamilton confirms three-year Mercedes F1 deal


Soundofspeed, So it looks like your mind is made-up on what JA said, well that’s a right of yours, but I stand with all quoted (my source) which is also a right of mine. Re your other added comments, I have long years of experience with JA and his salivating at the mouth mode when he speaks of anything to do with Lulu, something which I told him many a time. Re Whithmarsh/mclaren and Lulu, the exact same thing that happened at mclaren “take it or leave it” has repeated itself at Mercedes, as I already said, no matter how this subject is pushed, pulled, twisted and turned, the facts are, Dennis decided that Lulu had to take a pay cut “take it or leave it” and he stood with that, re what Whithmarsh said, “ the team is trying to re-sign Lulu on a reduced contract, by shaving one third of Lulu’s £15m a season deal”, “Lulu must accept a “wage cut” if he wants to remain at mclaren” go to= mail online by Simon cass 2135 GMT 21 September 2012.

107SS2009

May 21, 2015 10:39 PM

F1 » Hamilton confirms three-year Mercedes F1 deal


Speedofsound, I know what JA said, which if one goes with it means 75m for three years, which on the other hand is yet another figure. I stand with what I quoted (my source), Lulu has signed a three year deal which Mercedes offered him with a “take it or leave it” note on it, something which I quoted on here in German, I will repeat, The Lulu deal is, “A three year deal worth £60m, £20m a year basic remuneration, a performance payment will see this to a maximum of £25m”. What JA is not saying is the £5M performance payment is not guaranteed. Re mclaren/ Witmarsh, the mclaren offer at the time had the same note on it “take it or leave it”.

107SS2009

May 22, 2015 1:12 PM

F1 » ‘The Strategy Group is not fit for purpose’


richard: "well, i see that hmrc are chasing mr e for 1bn in back taxes and penalties as a result of disclosures in the german case". Richard, The one billion tax bill is because of an “under payment” of tax up to 2008, Mr E is insisting he had nothing to do with the bambino empire run by his wife and daughters, a backroom deal with the authorities from 2008 that would see him pay part of the sum is no longer valid tax experts says.

107SS2009

May 22, 2015 12:38 PM

F1 » ‘The Strategy Group is not fit for purpose’


When Mr F1 calculated that he had the teams that natter in his bag, he came out with the grand idea of the strategy group, but now that he found out that the teams that matter had spit-out his fishing hook complete with the 2.4l twin turbo v8’s, he is the prim mover and the one fomenting and pushing that the strategy group is not good for F1/is not fit for the purpose, he is the one instegating/he is now behind the people who are saying that the strategy group is not fit for the the purpose, poeople which in the first place should not be and are not fit to be in F1 mostly because of Mr F1 himself. As long as F1 is not rid of it's onehalfcancer left in it things will never improve.

107SS2009

May 22, 2015 2:31 PM

F1 » Hamilton confirms three-year Mercedes F1 deal


richard: sunny. if the deal is indeed 60m over 3 years, that is precisely what nico is on ! so glad to hear that merc are indeed treating their two drivers equally (for once!)
Richard, I am very much conversant with both guaranteed pay checks and bonuses/performance payments, only a gambling fool will calculate the guaranteed pay check with the possible bonuses and performance pay outs, those type of birds are never in your hands before they start flying.

107SS2009

May 22, 2015 8:16 AM

F1 » Hamilton stays fastest before rain stops play


George Zaidan: One thing for sure I see two practically identical posts, yet one gets soundly disagreed and the other got a vote of confidence. Weird eh?
George, I also instantly noticed that from the time this new mushroom popped up, but I tend to think more like it got more in common with the “civil servant” could be the troll is back with us, Richard must have missed this, as he is usually the best sniffer of such things on here.


Page 8 of 1241
« 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.