Crash.Net User: 107SS2009

Comments rating: -4419
Position in rating: 8645

Show Comments on:


January 29, 2016 6:23 PM

F1 » Magnussen closes on Maldonado Renault seat

MattShctick: I always thought K Mag was good enough to keep a seat in F1 and was unfortunate the way events unfolded. On a different topic: CRASH why do I now have an unremoveable advertising banner across the bottom of every screen? The bit with actual motorsport news is getting smaller and smaller and according to my malware detector some of your sidelinks contain malware.
CRASHNET was hit by the latest bout of influenza on Monday 25th “remote server returned an error”, to this day the 29th only partial fixes has been managed, which in turn resulted in the on screen advert at lower side of screen with some other side effects, such as number of posts not corresponding on what is shown on screen. What I cannot understand is, why does it take so long to fix this site.


January 28, 2016 9:39 PM

F1 » ‘Trouble ahead’ as Ecclestone warns manufacturers

Taz: Off topic but Chrashtor is out and K Mag is in apparently. Crash barriers all over the world are hastily arranging a mass celebration!
And the mostly British formula one press and their Lulu fanatics are now in a state of euphoria, since Belgium 2011 they never forgave Pastor for standing-up to Lulu’s bullying tactics on track, up to that incident Pastor and his oil money were ok and no problem as long as they were going into the pockets of a British F1 team.


January 30, 2016 8:17 AM

F1 » Marko wants Renault to prioritise Red Bull over own team

Wolfy35: Of course Renault are going to give a team that wanted to ditch Renault altogether but ended up negotiating a deal where they purchase unbranded engines and deal with all development themselves while putting a sponsors name on them priority.... Have a reality break Helmut you are out of the Renault development loop now you just buy engines and look after them yourself.
Wolfy, Yesterday I made the mistake of mentioning website detail and name of article writer in my answer to you, so my post was removed as per this site Policy, so apologises to CRASHNET moderator, MY MISTAKE. But here is my answer to your assumption that "they purchase engines and deal with all development" that is a no go, they RBR will not be able to touch those engines, regardless the stickers they stick on them.


January 30, 2016 8:02 AM

F1 » Marko wants Renault to prioritise Red Bull over own team

107SS2009: I do not know what "a helluva" of a watch sticker it is, what I know is that this "helluva" of a watch sticker replaced a sticker one year short of contract duration which was worth "US$ 70 million annually, pocketing RBR US$ 280 million between 2011 and 2015,
It was sarcasm on my part, essentially agreeing with you that they are the victims of their own circumstances, and no matter how great the brand of watch, it will do little for their performance.
beningnly, I had no doubt about your intentions (post) and thanks for agreeing and your explanation, also thanks for the "carry-over" of the post, this was the second time I was regarded as "attacking a team", well it is the moderator's prerogative of which we all on here agreed too, even if all I said were facts which can be checked-up.


January 28, 2016 12:35 PM

F1 » Ecclestone sides with drivers over ‘flat out tyres' push

Mario Isola (Pirelli), “If we have to produce tyres degradation we focus on that, If we have to produce long lasting tyres, we focus on that, we only does what F1 asks us to do” (note here, IT IS F1 WHO ASKS AND NOT THE FIA, “The heavy degradation era was prompted and has always been staunchly defended by Bernie as being good for the show”.

Page 9 of 1437
« 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.