Crash.Net User: Painless

Comments rating: 1009
Position in rating: 126

Show Comments on:

Painless

February 03, 2014 3:28 PM

MotoGP » Ducati already on track at Sepang


Let's see. First of all the keyboard brigade blamed the carbon frame. That's gone. Then they said it was the 90 degree engine. Yes, Ducati have to narrow the Vee so they can move the engine forward. Wrong on both counts. Honda has a 90 degree engine and the Ducati engine already has room to move the engine further forward and they have already tried it. Now that load of garbage has been replaced by stupid theory number three, mass centralization. If only those engineers at Ducati were as smart as the posters on Crash they would have solved this problem a long time ago. Too funny!

Painless

November 23, 2013 2:39 AM

MotoGP » Cal Crutchlow - Q&A: Part 2


For Cal Crutchlow, My two cents worth. Ask to ride every incarnation of the Ducati GP bike from at least the last steel framed version forwards. Maybe that won't be against the ridiculous testing rules. Then you will know something about the Ducati's development history and will be able to make informed decisions.

Painless

October 31, 2013 12:01 AM

MotoGP » Casey Stoner tests 2013, 2014 Honda machinery


Why do the Rossi fans hate Stoner? After all he does not have nine championships, as they constantly remind us, so why should they care? It is because of Rossi's performance on the Ducati, or should I say lack of performance on the Ducati. Do you really believe that if Rossi and Stoner swapped bikes at Laguna Seca in 2008 that Rossi would have had any chance at all? Deep down, the Rossi fans know the truth and that is why they always say "9 championships" because they have nothing else to say.


Page 10 of 27
« 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.