Crash.Net User: marbles

Comments rating: 532
Position in rating: 276

Show Comments on:


September 11, 2014 10:01 PM

F1 » FIA bans driver performance radio messages

I'm not particularly a fan of Hamilton but the Lulu obsession is getting a little tedious. Vettel has been heard asking for advice on several occasions, Rosberg too. No doubt Kimi also likes to hear information ,he undoubtedly still receives it even after his hissy fit last year. pit to car communication is still required for safety purposes I believe , but I agree with the FIA on this one.


September 01, 2014 10:15 AM

F1 » Verstappen crashes on F1 demo run

This kid is not ready for a full blown F1 drive yet.He's coming to F1 from GP3 , he needs more time to mature - both behind the wheel and as a person,how many 16 year olds can be trusted with the family car, let alone an F1 machine ?. Do we need an invincible 16 yr old with little race experience in an F1 season ?.I guess that Marko is just looking for another project if and when Vettel leaves Red Bull.


March 21, 2014 10:01 AM

F1 » Teams were aware of sensor issue

I think red bull were playing the odds on this one.They made a decision to ignore the info from the stewads .Altering the fuel flow mid race may well have seen their car drop from second place and who knows where they would have ended up . At that point it would be impossible to argue the issue after the race and be regain any points they feel they may have possibly lost. By continuing to race without modifying fuel flow they finished second and now can take their chances with the appeal to the FIA. Having said that it appears to me they don't have a leg to stand on .The fuel flow for all teams was being monitored and others have probably had to make adjustments -perhaps erring on the side of caution- red bull chose not to. Everyone was informed that there would be no "wiggle room " on this issue. The Bulls had one car that retired after 4 laps and one that finished second under dubious circumstances., reigning world champs or not they need to operate under the stated perameters .

Page 4 of 17
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.