Crash.Net User: redcarfan

Comments rating: 56
Position in rating: 1280

Show Comments on:


April 25, 2014 7:21 PM

F1 » Wolff in favour of cost cap

Cost cap! What a joke. If they didn't keep changing the formula costs would go down. Merc was the biggest reason that the formula was changed and the development of the Formula Hybrid cars is the most expensive in history. Merc said they would leave if they didn't get the politically correct "power units". Now they want about to cry about cost!


March 18, 2014 1:03 PM

F1 » Ecclestone warns quieter F1 could be costly

This is NOT F1, this is a politically science experiment. Has anyone else noticed that FOM does not have any way for fans (those who pay for F1) to enter comments? That tells me all I need to know about Bernie's regard for those that pay for this farce. The FIA site does not really want comments from the public but you can give your thoughts if you use one of the silly subject headings. I have NO desire to watch hybrid cars recover energy and "conserve" fuel. That is NOT racing.


March 14, 2014 3:39 AM
Last Edited 158 days ago

F1 » Alonso quickest in FP1 as Hamilton hits trouble

Just watched FP1. The cars are ugly, the engine note is horrible, very few cars were on the track at the same time. 6 cars did not post a time. The suspense was around whether or not the teams could get their cars:1. On the track, 2. Get the car to run long enough to post a timed lap. This is not F1, this is a series for what are now hybrid cars. By the way, the fastest lap time of FP1 was almost 4 seconds slower than FP1 last year. I have been an F1 fan nearly all my life, I don't know if I can stick with this politically correct nonsense.

Page 1 of 3
1 2 3  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.