Crash.Net User: Codger

Comments rating: 5888
Position in rating: 13

Show Comments on:

Codger

February 18, 2015 8:42 AM

MotoGP » ‘Final say’ for MotoGP software unclear


Pleases, Please, Crash.net, can you put a ban on F1 being mentioned on here. Can I remind you, and others, that this is a BIKE racing forum. Mentioning F1 drivers ( I refuse to use the word 'car' when talking F1 ) has zero relevance. Mentioning F1 rules has no relevance either. Snooker has rules but nobody mentions them. Beach Volleyball has rules too, nobody mentions them.

Codger

February 13, 2015 8:16 AM

MotoGP » MotoGP top speeds ‘medium-term concern’


It's not so much that limiting or reducing the top speed is the issue here, it's the fact that we don't want to see restrictions at all. My own view, having grown up watching 50bhp single cylinder 4 strokes race, is that top speed is not why we watch racing. Apart from Ago's MV and the 2007 Ducati, top speed seldom wins races. Racing is more to do with braking and cornering. Ask yourself why, if top speed is important (to those watching) why does Moto2 and Moto3 eve exist, let alone present better racing.

Codger

February 12, 2015 3:12 PM

MotoGP » MotoGP top speeds ‘medium-term concern’


Tetley......3rd reason that the number of gear ratios won't be reduced (from Wikipedia) "In 1969, the FIM , citing high development costs for non-works teams, brought in new rules restricting all classes to six gears and most to two cylinders (four cylinders in the case of the 350 cc and 500 cc classes). This led to a mass walk-out of the sport by the previously highly successful Honda, Suzuki and Yamaha manufacturer teams, skewing the results tables for the next several years, with MV Agusta effectively the only works team left in the sport until Yamaha (1973) and Suzuki (1974) returned with new two-stroke designs."


Page 6 of 449
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.