Crash.Net User: Googolplex

Comments rating: 4913
Position in rating: 12

Show Comments on:


March 29, 2014 6:43 AM
Last Edited 103 days ago

F1 » Malaysian Grand Prix - FP3 results

I just hope the difference between the Mercs and the rest can be contained, otherwise the race may be a repeat of Melbourne with the Merc (s) sailing away. Good to see Kimi seems to have found his mojo. Richard might be ruing this post after Melbourne- 'rbr has shown that it has close to the speed of the merc, due to its better mechanical grip and aero. if you don't understand that, just wait and see'. I am waiting Richard but I'm not seeing.


March 27, 2014 6:06 AM

F1 » Promoters will walk away over sound ‘disgrace’

From time to time I watch the classic movie Grand Prix with James Garner where you hear the classic note of the 60's GP cars. I loved that deeper throaty growling warble of those 60's F1 cars. If you haven't seen it, it is a must for any F1 diehard fan. The modern scream of F1 is not a pre-requisite, but the sound ever since F1 started in 1950 has always been important. It needs to demand that the hairs on the back of your neck stand up. I will be in Singapore later this year to find out why people are so disappointed.


March 24, 2014 8:57 AM
Last Edited 106 days ago

F1 » Red Bull appeal date set

Sunny and Rob01, Your opinions are strongly held. As I see it you both consider Red Bull's actions in this matter to have been totally misconceived and lacking in any understanding of the fundamental rules that govern F1. However, given that they have been the most successful F1 team of the current decade, surely you might excuse some of us for trying to reason why they might be taking the actions that they are. PS EEE ORR

Page 13 of 174
« 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.