Crash.Net User: Googolplex

Comments rating: 5670
Position in rating: 15

Show Comments on:

Googolplex

March 13, 2015 5:11 AM

F1 » Mercedes dominant as Sauber, Manor skip FP1


MrJones85:
Googolplex: Sauber presumably could have put one of their cars out there, despite the legal furore.
@ Googolplex What's going on here? JAIL TIME for Kaltenborn? Are these people for real or are they just grand standing? What's there end game?
No idea Jonesie. One radical theory is that it is part of a play by Geido's father in law to take control of the team when it collapses.

Googolplex

March 12, 2015 7:11 AM
Last Edited 18 days ago

F1 » van der Garde wins seat as Sauber appeal rejected


The Crash article seems to impliedly suggest that the Court should have had regard to the financial consequences of its ruling for Sauber. Not even Sauber argued that was a relevant consideration at the Court hearing. Justice Whelan told Sauber's QC that he should stop looking at him as if he were a dill. Must have been quite a tense hearing. The Court also said that whether or not it was too dangerous for Sauber to allow GVDG to drive was a matter for the regulators of the sport, and it was not a matter that the Court could rule upon.

Googolplex

March 12, 2015 7:19 AM
Last Edited 18 days ago

F1 » van der Garde wins seat as Sauber appeal rejected


107SS2009: As I said elsewhere a while ago, I might be wrong it being my personal opinion, but I am still of the opinion that GvDG will not drive for Sauiber in Australia.
Sunny, I think you may well be right. The Court has not ruled that GVDG must drive come what may, They have simply ordered that the decision of the Swiss Arbitrator that Sauber must not take steps that prevent GVDG from taking up his position as the contracted Sauber driver has to be honoured. How Sauber deal with that will be very interesting to see.


Page 3 of 193
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.