Show Comments on:

Nick636

May 13, 2013 3:56 PM

WSBK » WSBK Monza: Sykes reinstated to third position


Just look at history. Sykes has NO history of being unsporting! He's probably one of the best spirited riders on track. He did run up close to Marco and avoided a much bigger "scandal". At the end of the day, if Guinters wanted to take the position back he could have, easily, but by the next corner he had completely cracked off and I don't see why Tom should COMPLETELY stop to hand the position back. LOOK HOW FAR BACK GUINTERS FINISHED!!! And I am a MASSIVE fan of both these riders.

Nick636

May 13, 2013 6:16 AM

WSBK » WSBK Monza: Sykes reinstated to third position


@ WHHHHHHHHAT (and others) We weren't in the briefing and according to what I heard Tom did what was required. When he rejoined he left plenty space for Guinters to pass, yet Guintoli dropped his pace. If you see how far behind he was by two corners later, you can't expect Tom to slack off that much if he still had an outside chance of finishing in the top two and Guintoli had blatantly dropped his pace. IF THE STEWARDS DEEMED IT LEGAL, I GUESS WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH IT. I think it's unfair calling him a "Bad Guy!" PS. WHAT AN AAAAAAWESOME DAY'S RACING!!!!!

Nick636

April 08, 2013 9:16 AM

MOTOGP » Qatar MotoGP: Crutchlow 'frustrating' fifth after factory fight


@ Realist Cal was faster than the Hondas around the twisties. Then on the straight, not even slip stream could save him. The lack of speed from the bike on the straight was pitiful and has nothing to do with "Rider error"! Stop hating. It was a great show from Cal. And if anyone says the T3 is almost the same as Factory, just watch that blast down the straight again. PS. I am NOT brittish!


Page 1 of 179
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  › »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.