Crash.Net User: Nick636

Comments rating: 6523
Position in rating: 8

Show Comments on:

Nick636

February 01, 2014 3:40 PM

WSBK » Tom Sykes - Q&A


Very nice read. Tom raises a very valid point about evo. The BEST riders want to go FASTER and faster. (Kinda what I said the other day about wanting to see records, wanting to see them go faster...) To do that they used to go to motogp. But now it is no longer the best riders who graduate but the most well-sponsored... so wsbk got faster and the motogp fraternity,teams, riders and fans threw a fit. The world of PAY RIDERS created a need for wsbk bikes to get faster in a sense.

Nick636

February 01, 2014 7:12 AM

WSBK » Provisional WSBK entry list revealed


Rsmick You often go on about the level of the kwak, prilla and bmw. But do you really think honda (who, at one stage were running a motogp swing arm and electronics pack from HRC) and Ducati are that far behind in terms of the level of kit they're running? Even crescent are running the ohlins kit found on motogp bikes, where kawasaki are running showa (and no, I don't think that they are standard). I do think though that aprilia will struggle in 2015. BSB they were nowhere, there must be a reason they're not run in SSTK.

Nick636

January 31, 2014 3:58 PM

WSBK » Provisional WSBK entry list revealed


@ BikeWatch No, I don't think they are anywhere NEAR the stoc items. BUT, TECHNICALLy, if you have the dosh, you can build one.. CLose-ish... Ok, maybe not, but I like lying to myself. @ RSmick One should not assume.. I hate electronics. Strangely I think electronics, if anything, could be removed from the series. I actually, in a small way am FOR the series' reset. As long as they have a "clean sheet" in som easpects. I still think, even in evo spec, that the top guys now will be top then...


Page 14 of 214
« 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.