Crash.Net User: almaaaaa

Comments rating: 174
Position in rating: 901

Show Comments on:


November 09, 2010 5:29 AM

F1 » Boullier: Renault is in talks with Group Lotus

@Mr. Proton Whats with you and this whole rebadging issue? This is Formula 1. It has nothing to do with the road car divison. What Proton does is going to benefit them and Lotus Cars. Rebadging the Mitsubishis was a business decision that made sense to them and benefitted both Proton and Mitsubishi. Proton said that building a car from scratch for that segment was not beneficial for them financially. They did what made sense to them. Now, back to F1, and enough with this rebadging nonsense. Don't know why you keep bringing up the stupid rebadging issue.


November 06, 2010 4:08 AM

F1 » Lotus boosts winning formula with Renault engines

Tony Fernandes tweeted about an hour ago: "Much said about our name. To many people reading to much into it. We are lotus racing this season. Next season we are still lotus." AND "Makes sense for racing team and group to be reunited. How and weather it will and in what form will form discussions over next few months." So it looks like he's gonna do all he can to keep the name. All the haters and naysayers shouldn't judge too soon. People judged Lotus early in the year too, and now they have Red Bull Racing hydraulics and Renault engines. So let's not all jump the bandwagon too soon, cause some might end up eating their hats.


November 01, 2010 1:48 PM

F1 » Kovalainen to ROC again

@ slightlysideways He was, unfortunately, not fairly treated when he was in McLaren. Kinda like what they did to Alonso I guess. Its a shame really, I think Kovalainen has a lot of potential. Hopefully with all the Lotus upgrades coming in, he is given a better shot at winning, or at least getting some decent points.

Page 5 of 6
« 1 2 3 4 5 6  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.