Crash.Net User: TedG

Comments rating: 1081
Position in rating: 130

Show Comments on:


February 11, 2015 10:39 PM

MotoGP » Aggressiveness 'key to Pedrosa's title chances'

I'm sorry but I find it very hard to believe that Dani isn't given a bike up to the task. The bikes may be very different but that would only be because Dani chose those parts and setup. Repsol, Honda, Dorna or whoever want to see more diversified winners. It is good for business. Repsol and Honda would be happy with either DP or MM winning as long as one of them wins the WC. Again it is good for business, especially for Honda who's motto is "Its the bike, not the rider!"


February 12, 2015 7:05 PM

MotoGP » Aggressiveness 'key to Pedrosa's title chances'

TedG: There are only 5 reasons DP has not won a championship and they has nothing to do with the bike, and they are Rossi, Stoner, Hayden,Lorenzo and Marquez.
Not entirely sure about Hayden, Dani was a rookie then but you hit the nail on the head with the four best reasons in the world.
Yeah the Hayden thing was kinda iffy. But he did finish ahead of DP for what it is worth.


February 10, 2015 6:45 PM

MotoGP » Aprilia: We didn’t see the real Marco Melandri

Vilas46: TedG Has to be other Probleme in melandri head in my view... 4sure i think Aprilia should be a more competitive bike allready because unlike Suzuki Aprilia was folowing Motogp program with the ART bike and 4sure they where thinking on there return to Motogp wille Suzuki was not making any caind of race in Motogp and showup with a completly new project, Anyway Aprilia is saying that there work will be done for 2016, so its when they expect to have a better bike... Maybe Melandri know more then us and Aprilia will only use him in this sesson i dunno, but if Melandri will stay for 2016 he should be motivated cause Aprilia have the potencial to improve a lot
Let's hope so. Maybe it is wishful thinking on my part.

Page 4 of 132
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.