Crash.Net User: DontTalkNonsense

Comments rating: 2493
Position in rating: 33

Show Comments on:

DontTalkNonsense

April 07, 2014 7:55 AM

F1 » Vettel: You can’t be stupid with team-mates


Googs, completely agree with your comment. I don't want to get too excited yet and jinx a particular driver. However, the results so far have been very sweet. Nice to see the finger being kept in it's pocket. Once the playing field has been leveled a bit, and DR is still performing, well I'll be the first to shout from the rooftops. As for those saying Vettel was sportsmanlike etc..... pfft.....the bloke is nothing of the sort. He's a ruthless machine.

DontTalkNonsense

April 05, 2014 1:09 PM

F1 » Ricciardo ready to take fight to Vettel


Tomco, just taking the p1ss mate. On a serious note tho, I really have not seen any evidence of him 'talking it up' etc. What a lot of you guys need to understand is he has massive media interest in him. He's a relative rookie who has just joined the current constructor and drivers championship winners. The media scrutiny would be intense. I think he's handled it admirably. Would you all be happy if everytime he's asked a question he just said 'no comment'. Fair dinkum, you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.

DontTalkNonsense

March 17, 2014 11:38 PM

F1 » Horner blames FIA for fuel flow issue


Is it possible to run 2 sensors at one time? The FIA approved sensor and one of your own. Because reading between the lines of Horners statement, nowhere does it say they didn't actually run the FIA sensor. However did state their readings/calculations proved the unreliability of the FIA sensor. I think RB will actually win the appeal if they can prove that the FIA issued sensor is unreliable.

DontTalkNonsense

March 16, 2014 11:05 PM

F1 » Ricciardo excluded from Australian GP


Ultimately, if a rule has been broken, a penalty must be paid. It's unfortunate it's happened to Dan. He drove superbly and deserved his podium. However, my issue now is RBR deliberately dismissing request to reduce fuel usage after several warnings. This seems absurd. They would deliberately jeopardise a fantastic result? I think RBR have something up their sleeve that we don't know about. PS....Thanks Sunny for the informed responses.


Page 4 of 112
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.