Crash.Net User: TheHorseWithNoName

Comments rating: -288
Position in rating: 7816

Show Comments on:

TheHorseWithNoName

August 06, 2014 7:30 AM

MotoGP » Miller to join Crutchlow at LCR?


Realist:
Firefly: If he goes there his carreer is doomed. Let's see how he gets on on a Moto2 bike, he's not even Moto3 champion yet.
I have been asking myself the same question. Why such a huge push for Miller? It must be a slap in the proverbial face to the Moto2 guys who have come up the ranks and ACTUALLY accomplished something.
Like who? Because we all know getting a seat (without daddies money) usually revolves around 'fairness' rather than talent. He is leading Moto 3 and could be further ahead if not for some silly mistakes. I would take the opinion of team owners about his abilities over your worthless drivel. Weren't you that guy who claimed stoner was rubbish and his speed was all because of the bike. I see the quality of you opinions haven't improved over time.

TheHorseWithNoName

August 04, 2014 5:29 PM
Last Edited 389 days ago

MotoGP » Red Bull increases Honda backing


TedG:
RSMick: Show us the evidence then Mr G
That would take the form of the last 2 riders that jumped on the Repsol Honda and ran away with the championship. Pretty good evidence.
if the rider was any random monkey from the population, then it might be considered evidenced, depending if the control variables are adequately modelled. If the two riders are some of the most talented and successful riders in MotoGP's recent history, then, NO it is not evidenced. EDIT by CRASH.NET: Poster attack removed.

TheHorseWithNoName

August 05, 2014 11:57 AM

MotoGP » Moto3: Miller marks himself ‘five out of ten’


Nikeros: I'm glad Miller is in Moto3. Until he arrived on the scene there was no one in the class that I disliked. A viewer needs a rider to scream at and scorn. Thanks for filling the bill so completely, Jacky.
Why, exactly? Let me guess... because he is not spanish or italian? And who are you, a nobody, to pour scorn on a rider leading a world championship?

TheHorseWithNoName

August 05, 2014 11:42 AM

MotoGP » Moto3: Miller marks himself ‘five out of ten’


Ausrossi: V4 et al, actually I am Australian and could not stand Stoner, spoilt brat as far as I was concerned and have always felt that while an amazing rider some of his prowess stems from being in the right place at the right time. As for Miller sorry different kettle of fish, no whingeing just yeah I stuffed few races and so I mark myself down. Plus while not a media darling certainly knows that simply refusing to deal with the media is going to win you no friends.
How was Stoner a spoilt brat? Everything he was given was because he had talent. Fine, you don't like him because he beat Rossi head to head despite spending the majority of time on that crap Ducati, but to say that he is spoilt is more an indication about your fanboi character than of Stoner being given things he did not deserve.

TheHorseWithNoName

August 04, 2014 5:16 PM

MotoGP » Red Bull increases Honda backing


Peter Light: Back on the Redbull thing. I would love to know how much they spend on sponsorship in all sports across the world. With 2 F1 teams, just about every extreme sport in the world and the massive number of sportsmen and women with personnal sponsorship it muct be hunderds of millions. Anyone know a rough figure?
I was watching a BBC doco , 'Secrets of the superbrands' or something like that and they had an ex senior exec from Red Bull UK who said they put 70% of revenue back into marketing. So, truckloads then.

TheHorseWithNoName

August 04, 2014 4:41 PM

MotoGP » Red Bull increases Honda backing


RSMick: More waffle? I'm no expert but I think all the seamless gearbox does is select the next gear before disengaging the previous, it is still a manual operation. It is an innovation that will become common place, all Honda do as a brilliant engineering company is when a rule is put in place find a way to achieve the result with an alternative. You are like the idiots in 2007 that wanted the Ducati banning because it found a way to get the best out of its limited fuel and found a rider that could exploit it. What do you want Dorna to do predict what Honda are going to come up with next and ban it? Honda were the only ones against single ECU and now spec code and Dorna stuck to it. Honda wouldn't do as Dorna asked so they created CRT, next thing Honda back down. Have you ever looked at other manufacturers bikes and seeing what they achieve? Like Yamaha were the first to play with the ignition on a 4t to soften the engine braking rather than just a slipper clutch. [\bl

TheHorseWithNoName

August 04, 2014 4:35 PM

MotoGP » Red Bull increases Honda backing


TalentFan: @ RSMick Now the single clutch seamless gearbox exists (and it exists purely to circumvent a rule trying to keep automated gearboxes out of motorcycle racing) then Dorna should do one of two things... 1. Remove the ban on dual clutch seamless. At least then a more affordable solution is available to private teams, or 2. Ban the single clutch seamless so they have to go back to changing gear manually (as the original rule intended, and this would be my preference as it means putting one more small piece under the riders skill-set instead of a computer). Whatever, the single clutch seamless is a development dead-end, as dual clutch does the job far easier and cheaper already - so mass adoption is never going to make it much cheaper to make, and the massive R&D cost is never going to be recouped through sufficient gearbox sales. This gearbox was an expensive work-around to enable honda to get around a rule that restricted them from gaining an expensive advan


Page 2 of 11
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.