Crash.Net User: TheHorseWithNoName

Comments rating: -308
Position in rating: 6556

Show Comments on:


March 26, 2012 3:39 AM

MotoGP » 'Pleased' Valentino Rossi bins 'bad setup'

@ nick881 just had a quick look at and there was no motogp testing at jerez last year, so that makes comparisons even more spurious! My comment isn't really aimed at you, being from the more rational of the VR fanbase, but more toward those who are claiming that Stoner and Lorenzo should be waking up in the middle of the night sweating bullets for fear of VR's 'improving' pace. Let's not forget that mythical 'racecraft' that will bridge any gap less than a second too.


March 26, 2012 3:04 AM

MotoGP » 'Pleased' Valentino Rossi bins 'bad setup'

I know alot of people on this forum get excited when VR says he is making progress (despite the constant unfounded claims of improved performance since joining Ducati). Let us not forget that Jerez is much shorter than Sepang. This means that if the performance gap between VR and Stoner remained constant, the time gap would be smaller. So essentially, VR is in a similar position to what he was at the beginning of last season and throughout the 2012 preseason. Not close enough to challenge for wins or even podiums on a consistent basis.


March 24, 2012 4:30 PM

MotoGP » 'Good first day' sees Stoner fastest

Nothing to get upset about. Stoner's Honda was/is the fastest bike. That is a plain statement of the obvious. To be the fastest means your bike is faster that all the other bikes. Maybe he has special parts from HRC, because the other Honda's were/are not the fastest bike. I wonder what that special part might be. People who claim that it was all because of the bike are not thinking clearly. The fastest bike has a top speed of 0 kph sitting the garage without a rider on it. Clearly, rider is the essential part part in making a bike the fastest. To try to argue otherwise is idiotic.

Page 3 of 8
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.