Crash.Net User: iusedtobesleepy

Comments rating: 597
Position in rating: 206

Show Comments on:

iusedtobesleepy

April 08, 2013 7:22 AM

MotoGP » Qatar MotoGP: Crutchlow 'frustrating' fifth after factory fight


Did any of you actually watch the race then??? Cal was all over the Hondas by the end of the lap and was just left for dead down the straight. And don't give me that about Rossi having the same issue, he also blasted straight past Cal down the straight too? And Guna clearly doesn't understand racing either. Jorge could put consistent laps in cos he was out front without a couple of Hondas getting in the way on the twisty bits.

iusedtobesleepy

March 25, 2013 7:59 AM

F1 » 'Raw' Webber considering quitting?


Dark days in F1???? Really? It happens every year, it just shows how little respect the teams have for their fans. Team orders are only justifiable with 3 rounds to go. At this stage in the season it is a joke beyond all jokes. Who knows what may happen to a particular driver (eg Alonso today), so to start calling the result at the second round of the championship is a disgrace. There is NO justification for this, if it happened in football we would all be up in arms, but it seems OK in F1. Just what is the difference?

iusedtobesleepy

February 07, 2013 12:42 PM

MotoGP » Sepang MotoGP test times - Thursday (Final)


I am not suggesting we don't miss Stoner. What I am saying is the somewhat misguided inference that Casey would have been faster is just plain odd. He isn't there so it is irrelevant, and if you don't accept that, fine, but the facts prove my point. Stoner had 12 months development of tyres, machine etc between 2011 and 2012 and he only improved 58 hundredths of a second. So to argue those points makes your case a little weak.


Page 6 of 14
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.