Crash.Net User: 35edme

Comments rating: 26
Position in rating: 1883

Show Comments on:

35edme

October 08, 2014 1:01 AM

F1 » Raikkonen: ‘Is it safe ever?’


Ignoring waved double yellows shows that the driver was playing the odds that it wasn't that serious. The gamble didn't pay off. An alert advising of a possible STOP situation should have been accepted as IN MY BEST INTEREST and Jules should have been alert and cautious . Don't blame the game blame the player this time . I am still praying for his return to good health and F1 but facts are facts.

35edme

October 06, 2014 6:00 PM

F1 » Raikkonen: ‘Is it safe ever?’


Like any serious F1 fan I am praying for Bianchi's full recovery . I will however state that this has to be considered driver/team error as the flags as well as team instruction were more than enough to have alerted him to the fact that someone had slid off the track due either to that driver's error or a track/conditions problem. Extra caution should have been exercised.

35edme

October 08, 2014 1:16 AM

F1 » Dennis’ dig at Mercedes F1 engines


benignlyindifferent: Also, Christian Horner's comments that factory teams have an additional advantage by having access to the software coding to help tune the power unit's characteristics is an advantage RB will enjoy next year with Renault. Mercedes no doubt denies all its customer teams access to this coding, Mclaren in particular, considering their switch to Honda next year.
Doesn't Ron and company supply all of the software.

35edme

October 06, 2014 6:08 PM

F1 » Dennis’ dig at Mercedes F1 engines


Fullofit: Everyone knows I'm no fan of Ron, but he does have a point ... and Toto pretty much confirmed it without going so far as to say the actual words. And anyone who believes that all the customer teams are treated equally needs to ask how Williams, in their first year with Mercedes power, received so much information about the engine during their design phase that allowed them to integrate the systems so much better than McLaren or Force India. Toto's shareholding and relationships with Williams is the main reason for their miracle revival this year. Even if the actual engines are exactly the same, the information and integration of them is a key factor with the new PU's.
Doesn't Mclaren provide all the control units and does he give inferior units to Merc.

35edme

September 24, 2014 6:18 PM

F1 » Rosberg wants 'F1 constructors’ title out of the way’


WYNK: I'll sign up to the peace accord. If I can make an observation though, multiple disagrees of a forum post don't necessarily mean multi-rgb's, it might actually mean folk don't agree.... Re 107s speech, I've been around a long time too, but I do think things are worse now, because racist etc comments are easyish to moderate away, childish put-down 'humour' less so, and I'm sure the almost knee jerk inclusion of phrases like brain fart and fanboy not only incites people but puts others (with worthwhile insights to offer) off contributing at all
Agree.

35edme

August 30, 2014 10:54 PM

F1 » Rosberg disciplined by Mercedes


Being innocent and being found not guilty are completely different kettles of fish. Petronas had access to all that was said and made their statement based on what they knew. Rosberg has always been one of my favourite drivers but I'm not above saying that I was disappointed in his behaviour as I know he's more skillful than that. I'm going with the proving the point aspect and giving him the benefit of the doubt. That for me is now two strikes against his sportsmanship . He still remains a favourite in my book.


Page 1 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.