Crash.Net User: 35edme

Comments rating: 28
Position in rating: 1808

Show Comments on:

35edme

August 30, 2014 10:54 PM

F1 » Rosberg disciplined by Mercedes


Being innocent and being found not guilty are completely different kettles of fish. Petronas had access to all that was said and made their statement based on what they knew. Rosberg has always been one of my favourite drivers but I'm not above saying that I was disappointed in his behaviour as I know he's more skillful than that. I'm going with the proving the point aspect and giving him the benefit of the doubt. That for me is now two strikes against his sportsmanship . He still remains a favourite in my book.

35edme

August 30, 2014 7:28 PM

F1 » Rosberg disciplined by Mercedes


Is Petronas a fanboy of Hamilton. Did Petronas issue a written statement . Did that statement not decry the fact that they lost a possible one two . Why is there such a willingness to discount that it was the sponsor who saw what to them was at best amateurish driving and who was responsible for the apology from Rossberg. I am of the opinion that Mercedes made the case to keep the same lineup for Monza and not as some would say crucify Rossberg. When your boss at Petronas sees something with his own eyes you would be a fool to challenge him and Rossberg is no fool. Resident experts at Crash please feel free to correct me .

35edme

August 30, 2014 2:24 AM

F1 » Rosberg apologises to Hamilton and fans


ghogmk2: The act of Nico Rosberg being forced to apologise for a legal overtake attempt will not encourage me to buy a Merc, quite the opposite actually...........
ghogmk2, the sponsor posted a statement of their displeasure at being robbed of a possible one two. What option did Mercedes have since the sponsor had members in attendance at the race. They pointed to the driver costing them, Mercedes said sorry and followed up. Nothing to do with Lauda or Hamilton.

35edme

August 29, 2014 9:32 PM

F1 » Rosberg apologises to Hamilton and fans


sodesu:
richard: clifton. totally correct. nico apologised for the collision, not for causing it. lulu himself seems to have gotten his wrists slapped, but has fallen short of apologising for the collision. interesting that sky show showed that the same type of move by nico had been attempted twice before this year, but lulu forced him off the track on both occasions. i can understand nico saying "no more". maybe if merc had pulled lulu to task before, then spa situation would not have arisen.
But they didn't, they heaped praise on him instead, so they've definitely helped create this situation. And yeah again, as pointed out it was judged a racing incident by the stewards so I really don't see the point of Mercedes going back to put more fuel on this now, several days later. Why couldn't they just officially keep the line that it was an unfortunate race incident, referring to the stewards if necessary, and then sorted any disagreement betwee


Page 1 of 18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.