Crash.Net User: 35edme

Comments rating: 23
Position in rating: 2086

Show Comments on:


June 13, 2014 8:23 PM

F1 » Wolff: Hamilton ‘a driving genius’

Toto makes a statement which probably would be supported by most of the drivers and teams. These comments coming from F1 enthusiasts seem to suggest that Toto is in no position to critique his drivers even though he has Lowe, and Lauda to consult with. Question to all, what is Hamilton's disqualifying characteristic from being a top F1 driver, Toto has spoken on his ability ?Please clearly say how he falls short. Looking forward to the replies.


June 13, 2014 10:58 PM

F1 » Wolff: Hamilton ‘a driving genius’

richard: 35er. none of the people that you mentioned, called him a "genius" . i asked you to explain WHY lulu should be considered a genius. i am still waiting!
Toto made the statement, I said I was not in a position to question it. Lowe has referenced Lewis' car control and driving style as reminding him of Senna. How would you characterize Senna in an F1 car.


June 12, 2014 3:07 AM

F1 » Rosberg takes positives from extending lead

Prost Grade A, Senna Grade A plus. I'm grading their driving skills only and am including wet, damp, dry conditions. Rosberg almost threw 50 points out of the window at turn one, driver's skill averted disaster. Had ragged driving display during early part of race but came good towards the end helped no doubt by that unfortunate crash by Massa and Perez. Entertaining race.


June 09, 2014 2:05 AM

F1 » Canadian Grand Prix – Race results

richard: rob. the overheating was caused by the failure of mgu-k! lack of harvesting caused more rear brake use, as there was no regeneration drag. after lulus problems, nico was told to move balance more to the front, to ease the rear brake pressures.
An electronic component failed, nothing due to the drivers style, purely engineering.

Page 5 of 19
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.