Crash.Net User: walrus909

Comments rating: 941
Position in rating: 104

Show Comments on:

walrus909

March 05, 2014 4:28 PM
Last Edited 40 days ago

F1 » ‘A lot more to come’ from Hamilton


Back to the brakes again. I can't understand why half the posters on crash don't believe theirs a learning curve with the massive amount of energy recovery vs last year. Some driving styles it might not matter, In Lewis' case it does. Anyone who's ridden down a steep hill on a 125cc two stroke dirt bike, then a 500cc four stroke, would understand the difference

walrus909

March 04, 2014 2:48 PM

F1 » New systems 'disturbing' drivers – Lotus


Now that the tyres are transmitting even more torque backwards to charge the PU, it became necessary to add another complicated system that can fail. The 'break' by wire. I think the effect these loads are going to have on Pirellis magic tyres is more wear, and a lot more spins, if Hamilton is having issues, so are others I can't imagine some software trying to duplicate the feedback from the road to your foot, after all your driving experience has been acquired with real brakes. In the future, when this technology crosses over to new road cars, glad I'll be racing wheel chairs.

walrus909

March 04, 2014 8:50 PM

F1 » New systems 'disturbing' drivers – Lotus


Okay, over time, I got used to power brakes and power steering. And I completely understand what David and Richard are saying. My point is if the drivers, not the engineers, are saying that they are having to adapt to the feed back from the road, and the harvesting is changing their cornering technique, then its another synthetic answer to a question that shouldn't have been asked. It can't be similar in feel to last year, if drivers are speaking out. And Richard ... when the mgu-k fails. the car fails. You won't need brakes very long.


Page 7 of 78
« 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.