Show Comments on:

indianapolis2007

October 22, 2012 10:27 PM

F1 » Hamilton 'driving better than ever'


conti incompetence within the their team as Lewis has had to put up with so Lewis is on the back foot straight away. I remember Vettel having ago at Rocky his race engineer shouting over the radio "DO SOMETHING" when the RB8 had no pace in one of their races if Vettel had to put up with the **** ups that Hamilton as had to Vettel would be signing a Ferrari contract now. Mclaren has good engineers but they are not as good as Red Bull or Ferrari on strategy and make so many errors which has cost Lewis and themselves big time.

indianapolis2007

October 22, 2012 10:17 PM

F1 » Hamilton 'driving better than ever'


@indianapolis2007 Inconsistent car? could argue the same for the RBR and the Ferrari, Inconsistent pit-crew perhaps early doors and question marks remain about the team principal but overall the car has been the best arguably until the last few races. There's more to it though, he still loses his cool under pressure. .......................................................... You seem to forget the wet races where Mclaren could not compete with Ferrari and in the really hot conditions where it would chew its tires this is where the Ferrari was more versatile than Mclaren although being a slower car. and in the Easter period Paddy Lowe said " we fell behind the rest in upgrades and development but yes when the Mclaren has been on song it has been unbeatable but it has not been on song all of the time hence me calling the car inconsistent. As for Lewis loosing his cool under pressure i agree but you must admit the likes of Vettel,Alonso and Kimi have not had to put up with the incompe

indianapolis2007

October 22, 2012 9:59 PM

F1 » Hamilton 'driving better than ever'


Tom, i just think you should get your head out from your rear. Alonso the best all rounder in f1 and with your hate you seem to forget he has won nothing since 2006 and Hamilton's 2009 car was a dog and in 2010 Pat Fry went to Ferrari taking the design of the Mclarens 2010 car or the mp4-25 as he was in charge of its development before he decided to leave Mclaren hence the Rb6 and the Ferrari being the dominant car at the end of the 2010 season and in 2011 with the RB7 running a muck he still was the 2nd highest GP winner in 2011 this guy has been in contention for the wdc in07,08,2010and would be winning the 2012 if it weren't for Mccca inconsistent car and dodgy pit crew. Its People like you who comment with more hate than fact which makes you look like an ****.

indianapolis2007

October 22, 2012 11:33 AM
Last Edited 212 days ago

F1 » Raikkonen: Anything possible, just like in 2007


And richy regards Ron by making both teammates race on equal terms was good for F1 maybe not for the team as i will agree if Lewis had supported Alonso Mclaren would have had a WDC in 2007 the fact is Lewis lost the tittle himself and TBH if DiResta,Perez or any young driver had a similar Debut season to Lewis they would be hailed as greats but Lewis seems to get different treatment from the rest which deep down we all know why.

indianapolis2007

October 22, 2012 11:25 AM

F1 » Raikkonen: Anything possible, just like in 2007


richy, im not doing the blame game all im saying is if each of the Mclaren drivers did not have such stiff adversary in each other then Kimi would not have had a look in , by that i mean if Alonso never had as described by Lauda the greatest rookie as a teammate then im sure Alonso would have been 2007 wdc by many points and the same could be said if Lewis had not had a driver who retired the 7xwdc then i believe Lewis would have strolled to victory in 2007, instead we saw a canceling effect at Mclaren which left the door open for Kimi who was in the right place at the right time.


Page 7 of 14
« ‹ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  › »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.