Crash.Net User: Taipan

Comments rating: 8612
Position in rating: 4

Show Comments on:


August 27, 2014 11:50 AM

F1 » Kate Walker: Nico’s alleged thoughtcrime

When will Mercedes do the decent thing and TELL Nico that he is a number 2 driver and not supposed to win? He's leading the championship, being a team player and is the only thing in the team other than the car that isn't a total embarrassment yet they're treating him like a fly in the ointment. Imagine where Mercedes would be if they hadn't signed Lulu, still leading the championship, a lot less embarrassing moments, less hissyfits, less sulks, more team harmony and 20 million a year better off. Oh I forgot Lulu designed the car........ Oh look a flying pig!


August 28, 2014 11:33 PM

F1 » Hamilton ‘will always put the team first’

Taipan: Am I seeing things or did I just read that someone actually believes Lulu is the best driver the UK ever produced and Clark was just lucky? Oh dear.....
Yes, you read it. The (rich) farm boy lucked into the Lotus drive because of his friendship with Chapman. Hamilton is possibly the best F1 driver produced by the UK with the exception of Jackie Stewart. I know you hold a 'prejudice' against Hamilton but he is a true racer.
And you are clearly a true tit.


August 28, 2014 11:29 PM

F1 » Hamilton/Mercedes contract talks on hold

Clichy, Clark wasn't "good in his era" he was utterly dominant in his era, if you don't believe me ask any of the drivers from his era. Lulu has never even dominated his own team mate never mind eras. You sound a lot like RGTroll, poor you. As for Merc, maybe someone with actual power within that company has started asking some pertinent questions, such as... Lulu is the one that causes all the embarrassment for us isn't he? -yes boss Lulu is the one that's always in the huff isn't he? -yes boss Lulu is the one that's getting well beaten by Rosberg isn't he? -yes boss Lulu is the one we pay twice as much for isn't he? -yes boss So what exactly do we get from Lulu? -emmmm he designs the hats boss......


August 27, 2014 10:42 AM
Last Edited 1 day ago

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims

Hi Sunny and Ghog, First time on Crash for a few weeks Ghog, moved house then had a silly amount of work on so I haven't even had time to sort out broadband yet! Elswagger, There is nothing odd with agreeing with someone when they are right and disagreeing with them when they are wrong, in fact it's perfectly normal, Christ I even found myself agreeing with Eddie Jordan this weekend which is a rare occurrence. The odd thing is actually fanboyisim, where no matter how badly someone behaves certain people will still defend the offender to the hilt! Hi Richard, I'd like to say I've missed the Troll's contributions, but I can't. :p


August 27, 2014 9:44 AM
Last Edited 2 days ago

F1 » Rosberg disputes Hamilton claims

Googolplex: Taipan would be loving this. Rich, do you know where the old slider has disappeared to?
Been a busy snake recently, finally got a day off, hope you're all well. Firstly I can't believe so much has been made of a minor racing incident, oh silly me Lulu was the recipient so of course I should believe it. Secondly I can't believe the diabolical mismanagement of the situation by the Mercedes directors, oops being silly again, it's Toto and Niki and they are clearly as biased and one-eyed as the most barking of fanboys. At the start of the season there was some very robust driving by Lulu and Nico regularly had to take avoiding action and Niki - Toto loved it, now when Nico drives like that they think it's disgraceful and say so publicly! When Nico gets issued with team orders he quietly complies, yet when Lulu gets the same order he ignores it and the daft directors agree with him! WTF ?

Page 1 of 652
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.