Crash.Net User: Taipan

Comments rating: 7247
Position in rating: 5

Show Comments on:

Taipan

April 09, 2014 4:09 PM

F1 » Ferrari ends testing early in Bahrain


richard: this reinforces what I was saying in response to those who were criticising kimi. he was driving a damaged car in the race
More reason to criticise Ferrari though, the chassis (they think) was damaged during FP1, yet it was used in FP2, FP3, qualifying, a race, and a day and a half of testing before they realise that it's damaged. Doesn't sound great does it?

Taipan

April 09, 2014 4:20 PM

F1 » Rosberg’s pride at silencing ‘very unfair’ critics


If drivers are going to take the credit for Bahrain being a very good race are they also going to take responsibility for the previous 2 races being utter garbage? I don't know if it was temperature or tyres or what ever that made Bahrain a good race, but I don't think it was down to drivers suddenly deciding to put on a show. I don't think anyone can predict that China will be a great race or an awful race, so I believe after 1 good race that we can't say the new regulations are creating great racing. I have an idea, maybe the cars were less embarrassed getting their c*ck noses out in the dark so they performed better....

Taipan

April 09, 2014 3:55 PM

F1 » Hamilton 3s clear on second morning


rob01: we have had that for the last fours years. what has your panties in a wad now?
Rob, don't judge me by your own standards, men wearing panties is frowned on over here, obviously you're not quite so old fashioned when it comes to your choice of underwear.... As for the last 4 years, you cant say the Red Bull's had much of an advantage in 2010 considering how close Alonso and even Lulu were to them, 2011, 2012 and 2013 are you saying Webber was only good enough to win 3 races in 3 years with a car that had a 3 second per lap advantage? The Aussies wont like you for that one!

Taipan

April 10, 2014 7:32 PM

F1 » Rosberg’s pride at silencing ‘very unfair’ critics


Ojay: The same Vettel called the car s**t, the car Vettel that wanted to squeeze his team mate on the wall. Yeah Riccardo is quicker than you! Shanghai will be interesting - I have a feeling that the Hulk will be on the podium
Get your facts straight, Vettel was asked what he thought of the new sound and he replied it sounds sh*t. NOT the same as saying the cars are sh*t. And anyone who disagrees with his opinion is quite frankly deaf! As for being told Dan was quicker, yes and he told the team without issue where he would move over, no drama, no twitter outbursts, quite the gentleman compared to Lulu!

Taipan

April 10, 2014 9:36 AM

F1 » Rosberg’s pride at silencing ‘very unfair’ critics


riccy: continue race with much reduced down-force. We maybe now seeing the real talents Seb has compared to when driving those super Newey aero wonders.
It's interesting to look at former champions when they're given a poor car. I remember one who wanted to park it rather than race it, same chap took to twitter to prove that his team mate out qualifying him wasn't his fault. Haven't seen that sort of behaviour from Vettel thankfully, quite the opposite in fact.

Taipan

April 10, 2014 9:21 AM

F1 » Grosjean: Renault problems ‘not acceptable’


Taz:
DennisKwok: Hang on, aren't Microsoft one of Lotus' technical partners? Perhaps they need a patch?
Judging by it's pace it's running a badly fragmented copy of Vista 32bit
Have you seen the advert (on Sky I think) for the Cloud? "For the Lotus F1 team the difference between winning and losing is the Microsoft Cloud" (or something like that) with lingering view of Pastor nodding knowingly. Oh dear!


Page 4 of 603
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.