Show Comments on:

1Jez

August 17, 2012 12:17 PM

F1 » Maldonado targets Williams title


"I would give the opportunity for this great team". Who does he think he is? The only "opportunity" Williams see in Maldonado is the opportunity to pay bills, not win championships. If Maldonado wins a championship without a major attitude change, I'll eat my hat. He'll be lucky if he keeps his seat at Williams, let alone gets an offer from a team other than in destruction derby.

1Jez

August 11, 2012 2:00 PM

F1 » VOTE: Which F1 team has the best livery?


It annoys me so much when people comment without reading the article. It specifically said PAINT, not body shape! Ugh... I quite like the Caterham as a race car livery. Red bull looks cool, but Torro Rosso is too busy. Ferrari is classic, McLaren is iconic, Mercedes is... misguided. Sauber is too bland, though better than last year. I'm probably alone hear in thinking that the Lotus doesn't do much for me, but it's certainly isn't ugly. Force India is smooth, Williams is neat, understated and kinda sexy. Marrusia and HRT looks could possibly be prejudiced by their lack of pace. But that's just my opinion. :)

1Jez

July 30, 2012 4:16 PM

F1 » Still no points for Maldonado


More and more his actions and results are showing that his win was a fluke or a flash in the pan. Surely he would be unemployable at any of the big teams racing with one eye on the Constructor's Championship as he's just too much of a liability. Yes, he's a race winner, but he's the only race winner that is outside the top 10 in the Drivers' Championship... There are four drivers who haven't claimed the big haul of 25 points who are AHEAD of him! Headline - STILL NO POINT FOR MALDONADO. Can't say I'm surprised.

1Jez

July 12, 2012 3:20 AM

F1 » Ferrari in 'no hurry' to make driver decision


@Ranger - you say that Perez is not ready yet and prima facie I would agree, however let's think about this... It's not a stretch to say that the Sauber C31 is inferior to the Ferrari F2012, yet Perez has two podium finishes to Massa's zero. Obviously, this doesn't mean absolutely that Perez is a superior driver to Massa, though a strong argument can certainly be mounted that Perez is a worthy replacement. There's no reason a driver HAS to come through a smaller team with wins under his belt to get a top drive. McLaren did it with Hamilton in 2007 and that worked out pretty well. Just musing...

1Jez

July 01, 2012 3:35 PM

F1 » Grosjean: Lotus now a big team


Sorry mate, but I won't consider Lotus a (2012) "big team" until they get a win or two under their belts. For goodness' sake, WILLIAMS have a win! One can't deny the consistency that has gotten them to third in the Constructors', but in a season with so many teams taking a win, why have they not? I'll qualify that position by saying that I think they will crack a win very shortly and it won't be limited to one. Maybe they'll win when Boullier is off sick one race day...

1Jez

June 27, 2012 5:15 AM

F1 » Massa: Nothing went right!


It can't be down to bad luck any more. There's a point where the excuse that "events beyond my control just went against me" can be acceptable, and then it gets to the point that you're just not performing and these things happen to you because you're constantly driving in the wrong place at the right time. Massa has had no more than six podium finishes since 2009 and none since Korea 2010. If someone as junior and hot-headed as Maldonado can scrape together a win in a Williams, why can't the once highly rated Massa get so much as a podium in a Ferrari? And I don't buy the arguement that Ferrari post-2009 hasn't been itself. Alonso has finished on the podium 23 times since 2010! 23 to 5 in Alonso's favour!


Page 8 of 14
« ‹ 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  › »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.