Crash.Net User: 1Jez

Comments rating: 752
Position in rating: 199

Show Comments on:


January 28, 2014 10:52 AM

F1 » Red Bull reveals the RB10

Sunny - not sure I'd call this one a c*ck. Akeizm seems to have it so far with boat bow. Whatever you want to call it, it's a whole lot better than the McLaren, Williams, Torro Rosso and Force India. I still think the Lotus has one of the best looking noses, but Mercedes have now stolen the show entirely. No c*ck, no vulva, not even a dust buster. Just... neat. Lol, as a result it's probably bloody slow. That'd be a shame.


January 23, 2014 11:45 AM

F1 » First image of new Williams revealed

Looking at this computer image of a car... I just through up in my mouth a little... THAT. IS. HIDEOUS. Sunny - the reason there is fuss about the looks of the cars now is because there's nothing else to fuss over! :) They haven't run yet and all of us F1 junkies need to be opinionated about something - might as well be the Barbara Streisand inspired design of the Williams.


January 21, 2014 9:55 PM

F1 » Kobayashi to drive for free at Caterham

@Brain and Shamarone - what the hell do you mean "precedent"? Have you been following F1 for all of about five minutes? Ever heard of pay drivers? If anything, Kobayashi and Caterham are setting a GOOD example. Unlike Lotus, Tony Fernandez has chosen to sign up talent over cash which is a great outcome for the sport. That being said, not all those paying for their seat are poor drivers.


January 17, 2014 12:35 AM

F1 » Ferrari confirms launch date

I read F14 T as Grumman F14 Tomcat... Damn fine aircraft, for the '70s. I don't like any of the F14 options for that reason. The best has to be F166 Turbo for the reason that Ty mentioned - it's a return to Ferrari's unique and elegant descriptive nomenclature. Name the car for the car, not the year it was made... how boring a name is F2012? F138 is a bit more like it. 412 T1, 248 F1 and 312B - much better.

Page 8 of 29
« 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.