Crash.Net User: dmelb

Comments rating: 915
Position in rating: 123

Show Comments on:

dmelb

April 09, 2012 12:23 AM
Last Edited 825 days ago

MotoGP » Arm-pump caused Stoner slump


Are some of you guys nuts? He blamed himself for not winning - not the bike, not his team. That's not a bad effort. Though I think his racing strategy was perhaps wrong in this race - he should have slipstreamed behind Lorenzo for most of the race like Pedrosa did, then attack with a couple of laps to go. It would have conversed his tyres and energy better. Still the result clearly shows, stoner is the fastest by a mile. Too bad be ran out of steam about 5 laps too early in this race. Looking forward to Jerez. If Honda sorts out the chatter a little bit more, we'll see another good race.

dmelb

April 08, 2012 9:42 AM
Last Edited 825 days ago

MotoGP » Dark night for 'worse' Rossi


If you guys, his fans are disheartened by it. Imagine what Ducati are feeling right now. $20mil into Rossi's bank account & many more $millions have gone into developing a few bikes - tailored just for him. Not to mention what was reported to be many man hours working around the clock. The result must give Ducati a sinking feeling. Rossi was meant to be their big hope. Similarly Capirossi & Melandri were also their big hopes several years ago. I think Ducati should keep an eye on Bradl.

dmelb

April 08, 2012 9:30 AM

MotoGP » Lorenzo pips Stoner to Qatar pole, Rossi 12th


I posted this in the Stoner thread, maybe it's better here. Interesting facts comparing Qatar qualifying 2011 to 2012. Stoner: 2011 - 1'54.137 2012 - 1'54.855 Net result: Went backwards 0.718secs Pedrosa: 2011 - 1'54.342 2012 - 1'55.905 Net result: Went backwards 1.563secs Lorenzo: 2011 - 1'54.947 2012 - 1'54.634 Net result: Improvement of 0.313secs Clearly the Yam have made big strides forward, while Honda went backwards - perhaps more so than Ducati. We can assume that Stoner's 2011 time and bike would comfortably blitz Lorenzo's in 2012, given Loreonzo's qualifying time is still about half a second slower than Stoner last year.

dmelb

April 08, 2012 9:26 AM
Last Edited 825 days ago

MotoGP » Stoner concerned as 'huge' chatter returns


Interesting facts comparing Qatar qualifying 2011 to 2012. Stoner: 2011 - 1'54.137 2012 - 1'54.855 Net result: Went backwards 0.718secs Pedrosa: 2011 - 1'54.342 2012 - 1'55.905 Net result: Went backwards 1.563secs Lorenzo: 2011 - 1'54.947 2012 - 1'54.634 Net result: Improvement of 0.313secs Clearly the Yam have made big strides forward, while Honda went backwards - perhaps more so than Ducati. We can assume that Stoner's 2011 time and bike would comfortably blitz Lorenzo's in 2012, given Loreonzo's qualifying time is still about half a second slower than Stoner last year.

dmelb

April 08, 2012 9:18 AM

MotoGP » Stoner concerned as 'huge' chatter returns


The chattering problem is worse than the understeer problem plaguing Rossi. You go into a corner, the bike rattles and bumps and you can easily hit the deck hard. Therefore you have to be very cautious how hard to enter the corner and how much you lean. It is such a difficult thing to overcome. Stoner said he has to steer with the rear wheel in this situation, this means his rear tyres will degrade quicker in the race too. However, if anyone can upset Lorenzo in the race, it's Stoner - he just gotta remember that he won Qatar on the Duke three years in a row on a bike that was just as bad or maybe not as bad as the current Honda. Remember Casey 2007, 2008 & 2009. You were also leading comfortably in 2010 when the Duke's front end let go.


Page 4 of 11
« 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.