Crash.Net User: mrfill

Comments rating: 7848
Position in rating: 14

Show Comments on:

mrfill

April 02, 2016 3:14 AM

F1 » Ecclestone hoping qualifying flop was simply ‘unlucky’


It remains because there was no unanimous agreement..... Well, perhaps that is because you offered two options, both which were neither acceptable nor what was requested. Bernie had better hope for rain in qualifying. Its the only thing that could make this format work. Of course, rain often upsets the grid so it won't prove anything but at least it will make it appear not so bad. Then they can all pat themselves on the back and tell themselves how clever they are. My offer of a free ticket to Dignitas stands :)

mrfill

April 02, 2016 12:33 PM

F1 » Ecclestone dismisses drivers as having no voice


Man E leaves company A and joins company B Man E produces grand plan for company B Grand plan goes horribly wrong and value of company B sinks. At the bottom Company A now buys company B at a much reduced price. Man E is welcomed back at company A That was Microsoft and Nokia. With very few changes it seems to be a very similar thing happening in F1. However, snouts are still firmly wedged in the trough and only until that changes the fiasco will continue. The drivers are just pawns in the game. Pawns can take queens though and put a king in checkmate.

mrfill

March 31, 2016 5:23 PM

F1 » Hamilton wary of Ferrari as he looks to strike back


rob01:
richard: i checked salvuborg... it sounds a bit like sunny, but it is unusual for him to change his name as he posts elsewhere under his own name . how did you work that one out?
salvuborg told Mr Fill(who post on crash) to tell his old buddies richard and rob hello. He also said at that time he left here due to moderator. Additionally i found links to a few different names he uses with hundreds of post. he currently uses same one on the judge.
In my defence, he did not reveal any identity and also seems to have improved spelling/grammar which confused me a bit. I don't recall seeing anyones name specifically mentioned and didn't want to post that someone unknown said hello. He did have a big public spat with the J13 mods.

mrfill

March 31, 2016 5:17 PM

FE » Formula E unveils driverless Roborace race car


Gecko: People like and watch Formula E ????? I really didn't know that. A series that they have to change cars because they have run out of Batteries, and they weren't using Duracell ???? This is why F1 is in trouble, the powers are just not tuned in to real enthusiastic fans, Bernie wants Rolex wearing, Margaux or Rothschild sipping, know nothings following F1. Can you imagine then sitting at Stowe, with their picnick blankets ??? Formula One is lost if these people are running the sport !!!!
Yes, I watch it (not necessarily like it) and find it interesting that at least they TRY to please the punters. Live on YoutubeHD, dirt cheap admission, pit walks etc Not seen any of those in F1 for a while. It's slow and they sound like Hoovers but the racing can be good. At least their ideas are not all stupid (excl. Fan Boost...) And as for running out of fuel... F1 cars never run out of fuel do they?

mrfill

March 30, 2016 7:31 PM

F1 » Hamilton wary of Ferrari as he looks to strike back


richard:
mrfill: Bearing in mind that on Sunday afternoon we have F1 MotoGP British Touring Cars World Touring Cars World Superbikes And Silverstone 24H Can I borrow a recorder or two?
i may be wrong, but i think that formula e is also on! channel 3 e is showing this live
Saturday 2300 on ITV4 live (Long Beach). Time for a nap before the rest all kick off Sunday lunchtime... Thanks for the reminder. The Buenos Aires race was rather good.


Page 13 of 370
« 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.