Crash.Net User: mrfill

Comments rating: 6606
Position in rating: 18

Show Comments on:


October 26, 2015 11:59 AM

F1 » Boullier: McLaren doesn’t want to share Honda

richard: under the are actually required to supply another team. yesterday showed that the honda pu is at last progressing, and if it was put into the rbr chassis (which is far better), macca could well be embarrassed. hence their blocking tactics.
Do these rules also apply to Renault? Or are they a sub-section of the Rules We Find Inconvenient To Enforce, like the 'one version' rule?


October 27, 2015 11:20 PM
Last Edited 28 days ago

F1 » Ferrari veto initiates FIA customer engine tender

107SS2009: .......But this time it is happening with a difference, Marchionne had not made the same mistake his predecessor made, he deployed his veto on proceedings in a timely and appropriate time (see tribunal of grande instance judgement of the time back then on that matter) that is why the FIA chose not to challenge FERRARI’S right to use their veto this time. FERRARI’S veto rights extends even on discussions presented to the World motorsports council. And when considering that Totd know all this and his philosophy for F1 is one of change by consensus, and that he was part of this new engine formula .guaranteed for a lifespan up to 2020, Totd seems to be giving Bernie all the rope he need to hang himself with.
Anyone would think that Todt had been Team Principal of Ferrari :)


October 27, 2015 11:44 AM

F1 » Mercedes fear ‘Spa’ repeat as Hamilton, Rosberg tensions rise

kenny45: I think a lot of you guys who doesnt like Lewis, doesnt like him because he is the tigerwoods in the F1 sport. IMO Nico is just as good, but he is very unlucky and luck is what you need on top of your skills to become champ and not parents with a big house or a track record in F1 like verstappen. Lewis was on the right place at the right time.
FFS Kenny did Tiger Woods (that's two words by the way) have much better clubs than every other golfer? no he didn't so stop talking nonsense.
I do recall Tiger Woods having some difficulty missing a fire hydrant while driving away from his house,


October 26, 2015 12:18 PM

MotoGP » MotoGP Race Director explains Rossi punishment

Garry: A terrible decision from race direction. Rossi did not knock him off. He pushed him wide yes. Marquez fell of his own accord whilst riding like a piilock and destroying Vales rhythm . Marquez is a brat and what I have to say about him and lorenzos mafia is too strong for me to write. Rossi is the true champion.
The penalty was for pushing him wide, not for kicking as that was never proved. In other words, you are crticising race direction for agreeing with you. Weird


October 26, 2015 1:31 PM

MotoGP » MotoGP Race Director explains Rossi punishment

joe850: I assume this picture was taken like a second before the crash, It shows MM and VR still upright, and close to each other, Rossi leaning away from marquez Marquez leaning STRONGLY towards Rossi. Marc's bike is lined at a slight angle away from Rossi so if Marquez just went with his bike there would be no collision. .....
What picture? The one accompanying this article shows Marquez on the deck and Rossi a long way ahead and looking around to make sure.


October 24, 2015 3:11 PM

MotoGP » Pedrosa pole, Rossi front row

theblue: Is there a video posted of Jorge's meltdown?
The Lorenzo meltdown is a corker. Reversing in Parc ferme, steaming his visor, swearing away, the pit, garage. I searched on YouTube with search string "Lorenzo reversing in parc ferme", but no luck. I'll try searching under "Lorenzo meltdown at Sepang". Please someone upload that video. Its gonna get millions of hits!
Look on the BT Sport site under videos, in the section 'Epic fails' No kidding!

Page 17 of 324
« 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group | Built by Accelerate Agency

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.