Crash.Net User: izybluffen

Comments rating: 1010
Position in rating: 194

Show Comments on:


May 25, 2015 1:55 PM
Last Edited 342 days ago

F1 » Ricciardo: I think the fans enjoyed Kimi pass

@ Duq, I'm not really buying that. Kimi got sideways out of the previous corner lost time and knew he was up for attack, so he did the very old "I'll turn in way before I usually would" which breaks: 20.5 Manoeuvres liable to hinder other drivers, such as deliberate crowding of a car beyond the edge of the track or any other abnormal change of direction, are not permitted. In reality its a racing incident hence no penalty. Kimi pulled the old dirty turn in to keep position, and Dan did the opportunist dive. Kimi could of easily held the outside and had the inside for the hairpin which would of fairly beaten Ric. But no. Both drivers pushed the limit here which is what racing is about.


May 25, 2015 1:00 PM

F1 » Ricciardo: I think the fans enjoyed Kimi pass

20.4 Any driver defending his position on a straight, and before any braking area, may use the full width of the track during his first move, provided no significant portion of the car attempting to pass is alongside his. Whilst defending in this way the driver may not leave the track without justifiable reason. For the avoidance of doubt, if any part of the front wing of the car attempting to pass is alongside the rear wheel of the car in front this will be deemed to be a significant portion. Dan had significant portion and Kimi kept closing the door when he should of left room. Read the rules, leave favoritism at the door, case closed.


April 20, 2015 12:50 AM

F1 » Hamilton pulls clear with dominant Bahrain win

mytyresaregoingoff: Judging from some postings last week there are a few people who are so bored with F1 they did not watch today's race. Well guys you missed a good race, not a classic but a good race.
An interesting start and end but boring middle, typical of this era of F1.
The best thing about this race was the titanium skid pads !!! Now we just need big flame belches from the exhaust and at least a visual part of F1 is fixed....................


February 19, 2015 3:46 AM

F1 » Vettel a ‘carbon copy’ of Schumacher, says Ferrari boss

benignlyindifferent: I understand his desire to offer forth the compliment. However, Seb is coming off a season where he disliked the handling characteristics of a car that found favour with his teammate, who outperformed him by a significant margin. I suspect Seb will rebound this year with a chassis more to his liking. However, I do not believe Michael was ever outperformed by any of his teammates. Ever.
I love how when Dan beat Seb its all Seb didn't like the car, but when Seb beat Webber it was never Mark didn't like the car, it was fanboys saying Seb was just awesome when the first half of 012 and 013 proved that Mark did better before Newey found the EBD loopholes. Double standards ??? Cant people just except that unless your Ferdi, drivers perform better with a car they are comfortable with. Although Im guilty of the double standards with Dan just because I wanted the Seb fans to get a taste of their own medicine from Webber !!


February 17, 2015 11:59 PM

F1 » The future of F1: HAVE YOUR SAY

107SS2009: Removing the MGU-K and have two MGU-H?
Sunny, I mean no harvesting from the mgu-k, it still obviously needs to be there to deliver stored energy. See how many braking issues it causes with drivers having to use more rear balance so they cant brake as hard. Mgu-h harvesting is unlimited so two of them should in theory provide enough energy for the lap. Correct me if I'm wrong yeah ?

Page 1 of 46
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.