Crash.Net User: izybluffen

Comments rating: 842
Position in rating: 124

Show Comments on:

izybluffen

April 11, 2013 1:37 PM
Last Edited 369 days ago

F1 » F1 China 2013: I'd probably do same again, says Vettel


@ Richard "ALL" of this started in 2009 when Vettel punted into Mark because of Hamilton, and cost Mark possible victory. Then Turkey with a RB engineered move causing Seb to crash into Mark. Before then has Mark ever disobeyed orders or done anything sinical ??? Yet you continue that Webber is the bad guy that has done everything wrong, but yet has had most things done bad against him by RB. pathetica Also answer my question in another thread: How many times has Mark actually disobeyed team orders........ To my count it is actually "ONCE" and not the "MANY" times you claim. EDIT by CRASH.NET! Personal attack removed.

izybluffen

April 03, 2013 10:43 PM
Last Edited 376 days ago

F1 » Mateschitz: Red Bull driver talk 'speculation'


John It's not every time Seb passes Mark, Seb has made passes on Mark in full engine map and that was fair and square. Those 2 seperate occasions "were" on sucker punch terms. Big difference. While multi 21 might mean hold postion, both drivers were also told to wind down their engines to be within fuel limit at the end of the race. At Silverstone, both drivers were still racing and RB told Mark not to pass in fear of another Turkey, and there was no pre agreement of team orders. In Malaysia there was a pre agreement and Seb broke it. Another difference is Mark wasn't trying stealing a win as Ferdi won. EDIT by CRASH.NET! Attack on posters removed. Please stop these continuous attacks. This is a forum for sensible debate.


Page 1 of 36
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.