Crash.Net User: izybluffen

Comments rating: 987
Position in rating: 129

Show Comments on:

izybluffen

November 03, 2012 2:14 AM

F1 » Solid start for Red Bull


There is no way RB are stuffing with Mark's car. They need him to finish infront of Ferdi, getting maximum WCC points. The truth is Webber just gets seriously bad luck with junk parts. Happened his whole career, even at Jag and Williams when he stuffed in on the front row or was on for a really good result.

izybluffen

November 02, 2012 5:14 PM
Last Edited 748 days ago

F1 » Vettel: We still need to go at full throttle


OK, what does NOT having the best chassis and engine mean to you...... The best car ??????? Seriously ???? Cause that what the Lotus was. NOT THE BEST CAR !!! The RB has easily the best chassis with Neweys gizmo's which easily makes up for the Renaults less HP. Are you living under a rock ??? If Seb was so good then why has he not pulled off a stellar year like 2011 ??? So far this year: Seb with best car - win and pole, Seb with not the best car - No win or pole. See the difference ??? BTW Seb did no such thing in his first year. Didnt even get on the podium. You are trying to compare master to grasshopper.

izybluffen

November 02, 2012 4:52 PM

F1 » Vettel: We still need to go at full throttle


Mate, now your just talking BS. Seb scored 1 pole and win in the STR. All the rest of wins and pole are in the RB which is the fastest car. Senna with 16 poles and 8 wins at Lotus, which was not the best car shows the skill of Senna and the needing the best car of Seb. Can you seriously not see the difference. Or is it you cant hand a dead f1 legend being way better than your hero ??? You are a serious Seb fanboy if you cant recognise the raw speed of Senna in Quali.

izybluffen

November 02, 2012 4:37 PM
Last Edited 748 days ago

F1 » Vettel: We still need to go at full throttle


@ BK - LMAO - In 1984 Senna practically won the Monaco Gp in that Toleman !!! Accomplished nothing of note..... Mate are you 16 just getting info off wiki ?? The Macca and Williams were both better than the Lotus, Senna destroyed his team mates there. So Senna had the 3rd/4th best car and still got all his results. Have you seen some old 85 and 86 races where the 3 quicker cars powered past the Lotus easy ??? Guess not. Senna did nothing of note in 1992 you say, LOL, he still won 3 races against the mighty 92 Williams !!!! The Monaco race that year was a classic. Even more Senna won 2 WDC's against Prost. In 88 he won 13 poles and 8 races against another "great" Do ya reckon Seb could do that against Alonso ???? No way !!

izybluffen

November 02, 2012 4:42 PM
Last Edited 748 days ago

F1 » Vettel: We still need to go at full throttle


Mate your just upset that Senna could get poles and win without the fastest car and Seb cant. To say that Senna only got poles and wins in the Lotus because it was the fastest car is grossly inaccurate. It was not the fastest car, just had the fastest driver in F1 history behind the wheel. Again, are you just upset, are you even old enough to remember those races ?? BTW these are no conclusions as you put it. they are FACT. Trying to gibberish about it will get you no where.

izybluffen

November 02, 2012 9:08 AM

F1 » Vettel: We still need to go at full throttle


@ Richard - There will be another. That can do many things before they get to the best car. Senna and Schumi both did on many more than 1 occasion when the fastest cars were much quicker but they made the difference. The things with the cars being closer these days should make it even easier for the next star to make his mark. As for knocking on my countryman, we all know he is no Prost, but that does not stop me supporting him. Maybe if Mark was Seb's age things would be different. He has had some epic quali runs in the dry in Jags and Williams. Even Seb didn't get on the front row in the dry in crappy cars.


Page 15 of 41
« 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.