Crash.Net User: izybluffen

Comments rating: 842
Position in rating: 138

Show Comments on:

izybluffen

January 08, 2013 12:05 PM
Last Edited 549 days ago

F1 » Marko lines up new replacement for Webber


@ Richard - I agree with you on some points but the whole "team" concept does not exist in F1 especially for someone of your viewing experience. Marko's driving experience initiative is a business incentive that has to pay off which Webber was a causality in 2010 which Mark himself screwed up by going mountain bike riding. As a Webber fan I agree RB back Seb but in all fairness that's not right but rightness does not happen in F1 ! Lets get real mate...... If all things were fair and R&D is fair Mark wins, but is not consistent. When R&D goes Sebs way he does more with it. So I understand this whole jive but no need to run down Webber like you do Lulu or Schumi or anyone not in your book. Post now like you do in usual non Seb terms or I will run you down with every biased post you make, ok ???

izybluffen

January 02, 2013 12:18 AM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year vote: Full results


I still cant believe Seb fanboys are still sooking about the poll results. I'm trying to work out the logic here ok: Some fanboys reckon that Seb should have won the poll because he came 1st in the WDC........With that logic then shouldn't have Button won the vote in 2009 ??? and Lulu in 2008 ???? Yet Seb won the vote both those years. Also Ferdi probably has the least amount of fanboys on this site, they are pretty rare so he didn't win because of biased voters. Majority of voters have other favourite drivers like Kimi, Button, Webber and of course the Lulu brigade but they all mostly voted Ferdi. I'm a Webber fan by patriot default (Aussie) yet I was happy with his spot and I voted Ferdi 1st.

izybluffen

December 31, 2012 4:14 PM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year vote: 1st


My Lord, I stand behind Tiapan. With no doubt what so ever................................ How many dots must a man that knows real genuine talent, and real pure awesomeness and beyond this world speed, and every else thind that you god damn numskull idiotic braindead mofos cant undrstand what pure speed, talent, off the planet awesomeness, and godlike mosses prophecy is ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Yes............ If your were in Clarks age yes.. Then if you were in Senna's age you would know that nobody broke the adhesion limit over it then Senna.

izybluffen

December 31, 2012 1:24 AM

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year vote: 2nd


Some people just don't understand the concept of this poll (Mike) It was a vote on who you thought was the BEST DRIVER of the season, not who you like or dislike the most for whatever reason. Some of you people must be comical at election time, "Oh I'm not voting for him I don't like his shoes, dog, haircut etc" @ Taipan - You just said that in a way 10 times better than I did in another thread !!!

izybluffen

December 29, 2012 4:02 PM
Last Edited 559 days ago

F1 » F1 Driver of the Year vote: 4th


"The man wins his third F1 title and you rate him 4th This isn't a poll on who is the best driver. It's about who you like the most - period! A waste of time." This isn't a poll of who won the WDC numbnuts !!! If it was there would not be a poll !!!! This is who people thought drove the best considering all aspects....... GET IT ????? Especially to all the other people having a whinge. There are 2 obvious drivers..... Alonso and Kimi...... who did a better job in MUCH tougher conditions then Beiber and thats why to your disbelief that he didn't win. I totally understand why a fanboy wouldn't get it !


Page 6 of 36
« 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2014 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.