Crash.Net User: Bobkp

Comments rating: 140
Position in rating: 1050

Show Comments on:


June 25, 2013 10:30 PM

F1 » Hamilton wouldn’t shy from Vettel partnership

He got spanked by Button over 3 years and now he wants to go up against Vettel? Bwahahahahahaaaaaa! That would be gold! I'm just trying to think what excuses the Hamilton fanboys could come up with then? They couldn't pull out the old favourite that Vettel has a better car...oh, hang on, I know. They'll claim that the team is favouring Vettel and sabotaging Hamilton! After all, wasn't that their excuse about Button?


June 21, 2013 12:47 PM

F1 » Hamilton: Time is slipping away

@Jamal22 Like a typical Hamilton fan, you have missed the point. The argument by Hamilton fanboys is that Lewis has been denied another championship because Adrian Newey's Red Bulls have been too dominant. Like I said, the only way Hamilton would have been denied by the Red Bull, was if he came second or third behind one or both of the red Bulls. But that has not been the case. Since 2008 the following drivers have finished above Hamilton in the standings, non of which were driving a Red Bull - Rubens Barrichello, Kimi Raikkonnen, Jenson Button (twice), Fernando Alonso (three times). Do you get it now, or do I need to draw you a picture?


February 28, 2012 3:37 PM

F1 » Hill: Button always a dark horse

@Mark When are all you whinging lot going to stop going on about DRS. Oh, that's right, I forgot, Button is the only one who has DRS and the new tyres. Everyone else doesn't have either... It's you lot who always go on about how racing isn't like it used to be - real. Yeah, just like in the 80's - when everyone had something called the turbo boost button. Yeah, cause that's not artificial either is it? All 24 drivers have the same tools at their disposal, it's the great drivers that put them to best use. And by the way, I am FAR from the only person who thinks that Canada was one of the best wins in F1 history.


February 28, 2012 1:19 PM

F1 » Hill: Button always a dark horse

@richard Right, so the only reason he won was because of the safety car eh. Yeah right pal. I guess the safety car also didn't let Vettel come in several times for new tyres without losing any places. GREATEST WIN IN F1 HISTORY PAL - END OF! And anyway, if that's your logic, I guess you'll agree 100% that the only reason Hamilton won his WDC in 2008 was because Glock was on the wrong tyres on the last lap?


February 28, 2012 1:13 PM

F1 » Hill: Button always a dark horse

@bannyboy and Pole Position It always amazes me that Hami fanboys like you always prat on about how great he is. Usually the same people that dribble on about how great Senna was. But what's interesting is one thing that people always say about Senna and why he was so 'amazing' and something that sums up his 'awesome' driving is his performance at Donnington in '93. He was a master in the wet and adverse conditions - one of the big reasons everyone though he was so amazing. Yet, these very same people say that when Button wins in the wet, it's a bad thing. Unreal...

Page 4 of 6
« 1 2 3 4 5 6  »

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2016 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.