Crash.Net User: z33d

Comments rating: 2
Position in rating: 5858

Show Comments on:


June 27, 2013 4:29 AM

F1 » Horner questions Mercedes sanction

"This is news to me, where did Merc say they were testing new pieces, and where did they say they were testing current tire specs? " Where did I say they did test new pieces? There is no way of knowing if they did or not. It's a golden opportunity to test. All teams are working on new pieces for the car constantly. I would only guess that it would be highly unlikely Mercedes were driving 1000km unsupervised but chose not to bring any of those parts. My point was that there is no way of telling but the opportunity certainly existed. Also, why would Merc admit to testing new parts? Huh? They're allowed to run a 2011 car. That's what they should have done and this is the norm. Have you wondered what their reason was to deviate from this? They didn't just decide - "oh we have a few of these lying around that we're not using".


June 26, 2013 11:48 PM

F1 » Horner questions Mercedes sanction

@paulbysea - there is elements of truth in what you say but they cheated. You get more of a penalty for changing a gearbox mid-weekend than you do for being found guilty running your current race car in 1000km of testing. It's a nice opportunity to put a whole bunch of test parts through some heat cycles or put new components through a race distance and inspect wear without risking component failure. There was no ambiguity about whether you could test a 2013 spec car. I think a lot people would see this as a more blatant and reprehensible case of cheating than Maclaren possessing Ferrari documents but the penalties don't match. I do agree with your Monday idea.

Although the administrators and moderators of this website will attempt to keep all objectionable comments off these pages, it is impossible for us to review all messages. All messages express the views of the poster, and neither Crash Media Group nor Crash.Net will be held responsible for the content of any message. We do not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. If you find a message objectionable, please contact us and inform us of the problem or use the [report] function next to the offending post. Any message that does not conform with the policy of this service can be edited or removed with immediate effect.

© 1999 - 2015 Crash Media Group

The total or partial reproduction of text, photographs or illustrations is not permitted in any form.